Toffoloni v. LFP Publishing Group, LLC

Filing 78

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by LFP Publishing Group, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Solomon, Darrell)

Download PDF
Toffoloni v. LFP Publishing Group, LLC Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MAUREEN TOFFOLONI, as Administrator and Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF NANCY E. BENOIT, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LFP PUBLISHING GROUP, LLC, ) d/b/a Hustler Magazine, et al, ) ) Defendant. ) CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00421-TWT JOINT CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE Defendant and Plaintiff hereby respectfully move this Honorable Court for entry of a consent order extending for two months the discovery deadline in the above-styled matter. The discovery period is currently set to expire on February 25, 2010. (See Scheduling Order, Docket Index No. 58.) The parties respectfully submit that the discovery period in this case should be extended for two months for the following reasons: First, there are pending discovery motions, the resolution of which will govern the scope of necessary depositions and written discovery in this case, and the parties do not wish to incur the cost and expense of taking multiple depositions Dockets.Justia.com of the same witnesses if possible. Second, there are numerous non-party witnesses Defendant LFP intends to depose who reside throughout the country, such that scheduling the depositions at a time convenient for the witnesses and counsel for the parties has proved difficult given the travel required. Third, given that Ms. Benoit is deceased and her estate does not appear to possess many of her business records, there are additional challenges to identifying potential non-party witnesses with relevant knowledge and information, and Defendant LFP requires additional time to investigate and locate such non-party witnesses for subpoena or deposition. Finally, the parties anticipate that the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Defendant's petition for certiorari in March or April 2010, and the requested extension will permit the parties to continue to pursue diligently appropriate discovery, but likely allow the parties and the Court to know whether a trial will be necessary at or near the end of the extended discovery period and whether dispositive and other pretrial motions will be necessary. For these reasons, the parties respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant an extension the discovery deadline until April 26, 2010. A proposed order is submitted herewith. Respectfully submitted this 21st day of January 2010. /s/ Richard P. Decker Richard P. Decker Georgia Bar No. 215600 F. Edwin Hallman, Jr. Georgia Bar No. 319800 Richard A. Wingate Georgia Bar No. 770617 Zachary M. Wilson III Georgia Bar No. 559581 HALLMAN & WINGATE, LLC 166 Anderson Street, S.E. Suite 210 Marietta, GA 30060 (404) 588-2530 Attorneys for Maureen Toffoloni /s/ Darrell J. Solomon James C. Rawls Georgia Bar No. 596050 Barry J. Armstrong Georgia Bar No. 022055 S. Derek Bauer Georgia Bar No. 042537 Darrell J. Solomon Georgia Bar No. 305922 McKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 303 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 5300 Atlanta, GA 30308 (404) 527-4000 (404) 527-4198 (facsimile) Pro hac vice: Paul J. Cambria, Jr. Jeffrey Reina William M. Feigenbaum LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 Buffalo, NY 14202-3924 (716) 849-1333 (716) 849-1315 (facsimile) Attorneys for LFP Publishing Group, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have electronically filed the within and foregoing JOINT CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will automatically send email notification of such filing to Plaintiff's attorneys of record, who are participants in the EM/ECF system. This 21st day of January 2010. /s/ Darrell J. Solomon Darrell J. Solomon Georgia Bar No. 305922 ATLANTA:5203796.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?