Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 201

MOTION for Leave to File Corrected Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by J. L. Albert, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, James A. Bishop, Robert F. Hatcher, Felton Jenkins, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, William NeSmith, Jr, Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Allan Vigil, Mark P. Becker, Nancy Seamans, Risa Palm, Frederick E. Cooper, Larry R. Ellis, Larry Walker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Corrected Brief, # 2 Exhibit B, Redline)(Quicker, Katrina)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, -vs.MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as Georgia State University President, et al., Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CORRECTED DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW NOW COME the above-named Defendants and file this motion and brief for leave to file a corrected brief, namely, Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. The grounds for this motion are as follows. Defendants timely filed the subject brief on April 5, 2010. In reviewing that brief, certain typographical errors were noticed, such as incorrect page numbers in the Table of Contents, punctuation and omitted or incorrect cites. For the Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-1425-ODE convenience of the Court and the parties, the Defendants hereby submit a corrected ATL_IMANAGE-6888231.1 brief. A "redline" copy showing the changes made is also provided so that all amendments are readily identified. Defendants submit that submission of good cause has been shown, and that the corrected brief is appropriate and warranted under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted this 9th day of April, 2010. THURBERT E. BAKER Georgia Bar No. 033887 Attorney General R. O. LERER Georgia Bar No. 446962 Deputy Attorney General DENISE E. WHITING-PACK Georgia Bar No. 558559 Senior Assistant Attorney General MARY JO VOLKERT Georgia Bar No. 728755 Assistant Attorney General KING & SPALDING LLP /s/ Stephen M. Schaetzel Anthony B. Askew Georgia Bar No. 025300 Special Assistant Attorney General Stephen M. Schaetzel Georgia Bar No. 628653 Katrina M. Quicker Georgia Bar No. 590859 Kristen A. Swift Georgia Bar No. 702536 Attorneys for Defendants ATL_IMANAGE-6888231.1 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify, pursuant to L.R. 5.1B and 7.1D of the Northern District of Georgia, that the foregoing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment complies with the font and point selections approved by the Court in L.R. 5.1B. The foregoing pleading was prepared on a computer using 14-point Times New Roman font. /s/ Stephen M. Schaetzel ________ Stephen M. Schaetzel (Ga. Bar No. 628653) 3 ATL_IMANAGE-6888231.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day filed the foregoing MOTION AND BRIEF FOR LEAVE TO FILE CORRECTED DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF filing system which will automatically send e-mail notification of such filing to the following attorneys of record: This 9th day of April, 2010. Edward B. Krugman Georgia Bar No. 429927 Corey F. Hirokawa Georgia Bar No. 357087 John H. Rains IV Georgia Bar No. 556052 BONDURANT, MIXSON & ELMORE, LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street NW Suite 3900 Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-4100 Facsimile: (404) 881-4111 R. Bruce Rich Randi Singer Todd D. Larson WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 /s/ Stephen M. Schaetzel________ Stephen M. Schaetzel (Ga. Bar No. 628653) ATL_IMANAGE-6888231.1 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?