Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Filing
230
RESPONSE re 229 Order filed by J. L. Albert, Mark P. Becker, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, James A. Bishop, Frederick E. Cooper, Larry R. Ellis, Robert F. Hatcher, Felton Jenkins, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, William NeSmith, Jr, Risa Palm, Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Nancy Seamans, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Allan Vigil, Larry Walker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Maymester 2009), # 2 Exhibit B (Summer 2009), # 3 Exhibit C (Fall 2009), # 4 Exhibit D (Verification))(Quicker, Katrina)
Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Doc. 230 Att. 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as Georgia State University President, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § §
Case No. 1:08-CV-1425-ODE
VERIFICATION OF DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL FILING I, Kerry Heyward, hereby declare as follows: I am the Chief University Attorney for Georgia State University. I am authorized to respond to the Court's August 11, 12, and 25, 2010 Orders on behalf of Defendants in the above-referenced action. I have reviewed Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Filing, which is necessarily limited by the information provided by Plaintiffs. Subject to that limitation, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I have determined that Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Filing is true and correct. I verify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 30, 2010. /s/Kerry Heyward/ Kerry Heyward
Atlanta #1096982 v1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?