Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
MOTION in Limine to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence in Accordance with Order of September 30, 2010 with Brief In Support by J. L. Albert, Mark P. Becker, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, Larry R. Ellis, Rutledge A. Griffin, Jr, Robert F. Hatcher, C. Thomas Hopkins, Jr, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, William NeSmith, Jr, Risa Palm, Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Nancy Seamans, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Larry Walker, Philip A. Wilheit, Sr. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Quicker, Katrina) Modified on 4/29/2011 in order to update docket text (ank).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS,
Civil Action No.
-vs.MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as Georgia State University
President, et al.,
Upon review of Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Irrelevant
Evidence in Accordance with Order of September 30, 2010, with Incorporated
Memorandum of Law, the Court orders that the following evidence shall be
excluded from trial: evidence related to allegations of infringing use of published
works in conjunction with teaching or research activities (a) in semesters outside of
the May 2009 through December 2009 time frame, (b) in courses or regarding
works not identified in Plaintiffs’ August 20, 2010 filing (Dkt. 228) or the parties’
joint March 15, 2011 filing (Dkt. 266), and (c) regarding works to which no
Plaintiff has any relevant copyright.
SO ORDERED this ___ day of ________, 2011.
Hon. Orinda D. Evans
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?