Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 281

NOTICE Of Filing Proposed Order re 277 MOTION in Limine TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF IMPROPERLY-ASSERTED COPYRIGHTS by J. L. Albert, Mark P. Becker, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, Larry R. Ellis, Rutledge A. Griffin, Jr, Robert F. Hatcher, C. Thomas Hopkins, Jr, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, William NeSmith, Jr, Risa Palm, Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Nancy Seamans, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Larry Walker, Philip A. Wilheit, Sr (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Quicker, Katrina) Modified on 5/3/2011 in order to update docket text (ank).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, et al, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-1425-ODE -vs.MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as Georgia State University President, et al., Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon review of Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Infringement of Improperly-asserted Copyrights and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof, the Court orders that the following evidence shall be excluded from trial: (a) evidence related to alleged copyright infringement for which Plaintiffs have not provided admissible evidence of a valid registration certificate, or otherwise satisfied the mandatory preconditions for a copyright infringement suit, including, 1. The Cambridge Companion to Schubert (PE 71, 72, 73, 74); 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. The Operas of Charles Gounod The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz (PE 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 357); Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing (PE 406, 407, 408, 409, 421, 654); Language Testing in Practice (PE 418, 419, 420, 421, 655); Assessing Listening (PE 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 648); Assessing Speaking (PE 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 650); Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (PE 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 651); Assessing Vocabulary (PE 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 652); Assessing Writing (PE 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 653); The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (PE 95, 96, 98, 99, 630); and The Cambridge Companion to Bach (PE 49, 50, 51, 52). and (b) evidence related to alleged copyright infringement for which Plaintiffs have not provided any admissible evidence regarding their alleged ownership of the copyright in the works, including 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Writing: Resource Books for Teachers (PE 357, 378, 484, 485, 663); Vocabulary (PE 357, 378, 481, 482, 483, 664); Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (PE 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 575); Handbook of Narrative Inquiry (PE 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 326, 574, 780); Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns (293, 294, 295, 296, 297); Awakening Children’s Minds (354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 486, 487, 502, 597, 599); Assessing Speaking (PE 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 650); Assessing Listening (PE 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 648); Assessing Vocabulary (PE 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 652); 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (PE 357, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 405); North Italian Church Music in the Age of Monteverdi (PE 357, 378, 439); The Politics of Public Housing: Black Women’s Struggles Against Urban Inequality (PE 366, 445, 446, 447, 601); Contemporary Cases in U.S. Foreign Policy: From Terrorism to Trade (PE 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 621); U.S. Foreign Policy: The Paradox of World Power (PE 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 622); Social Theory: Roots and Branches Readings (PE 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 665); and Challenges of the Third Age: Meaning and Purpose in Later Life (PE 357, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 609). SO ORDERED this ___ day of ________, 2011. ____________________________ Hon. Orinda D. Evans United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?