Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 298

REPLY BRIEF re 273 MOTION in Limine to Overrule Objections to Evidence of Alleged Infringements filed by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Rains, John)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT A From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Singer, Randi Schaetzel, Steve; Larson, Todd; Edward B. Krugman Askew, Tony; Harbin, John; Moffitt, Natasha; Quicker, Katrina M. (Atlanta); Rich, Bruce; Bloom, Jonathan; John H. Rains IV RE: Deposition Scheduling Monday, April 18, 2011 12:38:54 PM Steve:   Yes, we confirm that Professor Kaufmann will not be deposed again and that Plaintiffs are withdrawing the allegation of infringement as to Professor Lloyd such that Professor Lloyd will not be deposed.   In addition, we also discussed that:   ·         To the extent Defendants go forward with any "depositions to preserve testimony for trial," it is explicitly without waiver by Plaintiffs.  Plaintiffs expressly reserve and do not waive the right to object to any attempts by Defendants to introduce any deposition testimony of witnesses who are not unavailable within the meaning of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The parties agree that these depositions are going forward in the interests of time and in the spirit of cooperation, but that Plaintiffs expressly reserve the right to argue that such deposition testimony is precluded by the Rules.  ·         Notwithstanding the fact that there is no prior agreement between the parties as to the duration of these depositions, Plaintiffs will attempt to conduct depositions in an efficient manner.  The parties acknowledge, however, that to the extent Defendants intend to take "depositions to preserve testimony for trial," the proposed scheduling set forth in your email yesterday may not work.  ·         You will inquire whether King & Spalding is authorized to accept service of trial subpoenas for professors and/or administrators.    We look forward to hearing from you as to the location of these depositions.   Regards, Randi   Randi W. Singer Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 randi.singer@weil.com +1 212 310 8152 Direct +1 212 310 8007 Fax   From: Schaetzel, Steve [mailto:SSchaetzel@KSLAW.com] EXHIBIT A - 1 Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 12:26 PM To: Singer, Randi; Larson, Todd; 'krugman@bmelaw.com' Cc: Askew, Tony; Harbin, John; Moffitt, Natasha; Quicker, Katrina M. (Atlanta) Subject: Deposition Scheduling   Randi,   To confirm part of our call, we are agreed that Prof. Kaufmann will not be deposed, and that the Plaintiff's are withdrawing the allegation of infringement as to Prof. Lloyd, such that Prof. Lloyd will not be deposed.  We are considering the other issues discussed and will be back in touch later today.   thanks. steve   Steve Schaetzel King & Spalding LLP 404.572.2531 sschaetzel@kslaw.com       ________________________________   King & Spalding Confidentiality Notice: This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. EXHIBIT A - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?