Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 361

NOTICE by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc. Revised Filing Concerning Plaintiff Works Alleged to be Infringed at GSU During the 2009 Maymester, Summer 2009, and Fall 2009 Academic Terms (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Rains, John)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action File No.1:08-CV-1425-ODE v. MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as Georgia State University President, et al., Defendants. REVISED FILING CONCERNING PLAINTIFF WORKS ALLEGED TO BE INFRINGED AT GSU DURING THE 2009 MAYMESTER, SUMMER 2009, AND FALL 2009 ACADEMIC TERMS Plaintiffs Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., and SAGE Publications, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) hereby submit this revised filing detailing the alleged infringements of Plaintiffs’ works at Georgia State University during the 2009 Maymester, Summer 2009, and Fall 2009 academic terms. This filing updates the information reflected on the Joint Filing of Alleged Infringements (Docket No. 266) to reflect only those takings which Plaintiffs continue to maintain claims concerning for the aforementioned periods. These 882614.1 remaining claims cumulate to 75 instances of claimed infringement relating to 64 separate works. For the Court’s convenience, the Plaintiffs have created, and provide herewith, three charts – one each for the 2009 Maymester (Exhibit A), the 2009 Summer term (Exhibit B), and the 2009 Fall term (Exhibit C) – reflecting the claimed infringing works and infringements for these respective periods. Plaintiffs have also created one-page summaries of each entry that appears on these charts (Exhibit D). These summaries reflect the information identified on the charts and summarize trial testimony and trial exhibits already in evidence concerning each entry on the charts. Respectfully submitted this 1st day of June, 2011. /s/ John H. Rains IV Edward B. Krugman Georgia Bar No. 429927 John H. Rains IV Georgia Bar No. 556052 BONDURANT, MIXSON & ELMORE, LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street NW Suite 3900 Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-4100 Facsimile: (404) 881-4111 krugman@bmelaw.com rains@bmelaw.com 882614.1 2 R. Bruce Rich (pro hac vice) Randi Singer (pro hac vice) Jonathan Bloom (pro hac vice) Todd D. Larson (pro hac vice) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 r.bruce.rich@weil.com randi.singer@weil.com jonathan.bloom@weil.com todd.larson@weil.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 882614.1 3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that this document was prepared in Times New Roman 14 point font. /s/ John H. Rains IV John H. Rains IV 882614.1 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day filed the foregoing REVISED FILING CONCERNING PLAINTIFF WORKS ALLEGED TO BE INFRINGED AT GSU DURING THE 2009 MAYMESTER, SUMMER 2009, AND FALL 2009 ACADEMIC TERMS with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF filing system which will send e-mail notification of such filing to opposing counsel as follows: Stephen M. Schaetzel, Esq. John W. Harbin, Esq. Natasha H. Moffitt, Esq. Kristen A. Swift, Esq. C. Suzanne Johnson, Esq. Mary Katherine Bates, Esq. KING & SPALDING 1180 Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Katrina M. Quicker, Esq. Richard W. Miller, Esq. BALLARD SPAHR, LLP 999 Peachtree Street, Suite 1000 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Anthony B. Askew, Esq. MCKEON, MEUNIER, CARLIN & CURFMAN, LLC 817 W. Peachtree Street, Suite 900 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Mary Jo Volkert, Esq. Assistant State Attorney General 40 Capitol Square Atlanta, Georgia 30334 882614.1 5 This 1st day of June, 2011. /s/ John H. Rains IV John H. Rains IV 882614.1 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?