Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Filing
361
NOTICE by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc. Revised Filing Concerning Plaintiff Works Alleged to be Infringed at GSU During the 2009 Maymester, Summer 2009, and Fall 2009 Academic Terms (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Rains, John)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action File
No.1:08-CV-1425-ODE
v.
MARK P. BECKER, in his official
capacity as Georgia State University
President, et al.,
Defendants.
REVISED FILING CONCERNING PLAINTIFF WORKS ALLEGED
TO BE INFRINGED AT GSU DURING THE 2009 MAYMESTER,
SUMMER 2009, AND FALL 2009 ACADEMIC TERMS
Plaintiffs Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., and
SAGE Publications, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) hereby submit this revised
filing detailing the alleged infringements of Plaintiffs’ works at Georgia State
University during the 2009 Maymester, Summer 2009, and Fall 2009 academic
terms. This filing updates the information reflected on the Joint Filing of Alleged
Infringements (Docket No. 266) to reflect only those takings which Plaintiffs
continue to maintain claims concerning for the aforementioned periods. These
882614.1
remaining claims cumulate to 75 instances of claimed infringement relating to 64
separate works.
For the Court’s convenience, the Plaintiffs have created, and provide
herewith, three charts – one each for the 2009 Maymester (Exhibit A), the 2009
Summer term (Exhibit B), and the 2009 Fall term (Exhibit C) – reflecting the
claimed infringing works and infringements for these respective periods.
Plaintiffs have also created one-page summaries of each entry that appears
on these charts (Exhibit D). These summaries reflect the information identified on
the charts and summarize trial testimony and trial exhibits already in evidence
concerning each entry on the charts.
Respectfully submitted this 1st day of June, 2011.
/s/ John H. Rains IV
Edward B. Krugman
Georgia Bar No. 429927
John H. Rains IV
Georgia Bar No. 556052
BONDURANT, MIXSON & ELMORE, LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street NW
Suite 3900
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: (404) 881-4100
Facsimile: (404) 881-4111
krugman@bmelaw.com
rains@bmelaw.com
882614.1
2
R. Bruce Rich (pro hac vice)
Randi Singer (pro hac vice)
Jonathan Bloom (pro hac vice)
Todd D. Larson (pro hac vice)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
Telephone: (212) 310-8000
Facsimile: (212) 310-8007
r.bruce.rich@weil.com
randi.singer@weil.com
jonathan.bloom@weil.com
todd.larson@weil.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
882614.1
3
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that this document was prepared in Times New Roman 14
point font.
/s/ John H. Rains IV
John H. Rains IV
882614.1
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day filed the foregoing REVISED FILING
CONCERNING PLAINTIFF WORKS ALLEGED TO BE INFRINGED AT
GSU DURING THE 2009 MAYMESTER, SUMMER 2009, AND FALL 2009
ACADEMIC TERMS with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF filing system
which will send e-mail notification of such filing to opposing counsel as follows:
Stephen M. Schaetzel, Esq.
John W. Harbin, Esq.
Natasha H. Moffitt, Esq.
Kristen A. Swift, Esq.
C. Suzanne Johnson, Esq.
Mary Katherine Bates, Esq.
KING & SPALDING
1180 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Katrina M. Quicker, Esq.
Richard W. Miller, Esq.
BALLARD SPAHR, LLP
999 Peachtree Street, Suite 1000
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Anthony B. Askew, Esq.
MCKEON, MEUNIER, CARLIN & CURFMAN, LLC
817 W. Peachtree Street, Suite 900
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
Mary Jo Volkert, Esq.
Assistant State Attorney General
40 Capitol Square
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
882614.1
5
This 1st day of June, 2011.
/s/ John H. Rains IV
John H. Rains IV
882614.1
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?