Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 409

Proposed Findings of Fact by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A - Redacted, # 2 Appendix B, # 3 Appendix C, # 4 Appendix D, # 5 Appendix E, # 6 Brief Plaintiffs' Post-Trial Conclusions of Law)(Rains, John)

Download PDF

Appendix C Kaufmann Attended Training Filled out Checklist Physically Retained checklist Created/ Recreated Checklist Uses Percentage Test Checklists Checked NonTransformative Checked Large Portion Investigated Licensing Options Checked Numerous Copies Made Checked Repeated Use Checked Required Reading TOTAL TALLY (Checks For/Against Fair Use) Esposito Kim    () () () () () () Hankla Hartwig Gainty Moloney Kruger Murphy Duffield McCoy    PX 595-96 647-52 654-55  DX 346-348 428-429     DX 473474   PX 570 PX 938 PX 608  PX 597-599       PX 656-662 PX 563 PX 606 DX 464        DX 480-481  Greenberg   PX 564-567 Dixon   PX 571-79 581-594 628-629 Davis Gabler Hover () () Orr   12-3 8-1 14-1  ()   7-2, 12-2  13 – 0 16-0 N/A 8-0 13-0 15-1  N/A 14-0 APPENDIX C - 1 11-1 14-0 16-0 14-1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?