Inniss et al v. Aderhold et al
Filing
19
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time Revised Consent Motion For Extension of Time to File a Response Either by Answer or Motion to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Deborah Aderhold, Brook Davidson, Pinkie Toomer. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Orland, Devon) Modified on 5/30/2014 in order to update motion type (anc).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
Christopher Inniss and Shelton
Stroman; Rayshawn Chandler and
Avery Chandler; Michael Bishop
And Johnny Shane Thomas; and
Jennifer Sisson, on behalf of
Themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Deborah Aderhold, in her official
capacity; Brook Davidson, in her
official capacity, and Judge Pinkie
Toomer in her official capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action Number
1:14-CV-01180-WSD
ORDER
THIS MATTER coming before the Court on Defendants’ Consent Motion
for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, due notice to the parties and
the Court being advised of the premises and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall have an additional
thirty (30) days, up to and including July 21 2014, in which to respond to
Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED, this ____ day of _______________, 2014.
____________________________
Hon. William S. Duffey Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?