Inniss et al v. Aderhold et al

Filing 55

MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint by Deborah Aderhold, Monica P. Fenton. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Orland, Devon) Modified on 2/3/2015 to correct filing attorney(hfm).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION

Christopher Inniss and Shelton
Stroman; Rayshawn Chandler and
Avery Chandler; Michael Bishop
And Johnny Shane Thomas; and
Jennifer Sisson, on behalf of
Themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Deborah Aderhold et al,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action Number
1:14-CV-01180-WSD

ORDER
THIS MATTER coming before the Court on Defendants’ motion to extend
time to answer the Amended Complaint in the above styed case, the Court being
advised of the premises and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT:
The motion is GRANTED. In the event the Court denies Defendants’
Motion to Stay Proceedings, they shall have 14 days from the date of the denial to
answer the complaint. In the event the Court grants the motion to stay, the time for
Defendants’ answer will be dictated by subsequent scheduling order of Court.

SO ORDERED this ______day of _______________, 2015.

_______________________________
The Hon. William S. Duffey
Judge United States District Court