State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 129

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Navdeep Singh Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-1841986.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Navdeep Singh, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela)

Download PDF
HID 007A (Rev. 02 /14) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Hawaii STATE OF HAWAI`I andISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiff v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacityas President the United States; of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY JOHNF KELLY i Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-CV-00050-DKW-KSC MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Attach Declaration of Counsel in support of motion. $300.00 assessment required to be paid through Name of Attorney: NavdeepSingh Firm Name: NationalAsian Pacific AmericanBar Association Firm Address: 1612K StreetNW, Suite510 Washington, D.C. 20006 Attorney CM/ECF Primary email address: Firm Telephone: 202-775-9555 Firm Fax: 202-775-9333 Party Represented: NationalAsian Pacific AmericanBar Association Pamela Bunn W. Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing 1001BishopSt. Suite1800 Honolulu Hawaii 96813 Pursuant to LR 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, the undersigned applies for an order permitting the above-named attorney to appear and participate as counsel pro hac vice for the above-named party in all matters in the above-captioned case or proceeding. This request is based on the declaration of the attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice. Name/Address of Local Counsel March 11, 2017 Dated: /s/ Pamela W. Bunn Signature* (Print name if original signature) *If this motion is being signed by local counsel on behalf of the applicant, the signature constitutes consent to the designation as associate counsel; otherwise such consent shall be filed separately.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?