State of Hawaii v. Trump
Filing
129
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Navdeep Singh Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-1841986.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Navdeep Singh, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela)
HID 007A (Rev. 02 /14) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of Hawaii
STATE OF HAWAI`I andISMAIL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiff
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacityas
President the United States;
of
U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY JOHNF KELLY i
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.
1:17-CV-00050-DKW-KSC
MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
(Attach Declaration of Counsel in support of motion. $300.00 assessment required to be paid through Pay.gov.)
Name of Attorney:
NavdeepSingh
Firm Name:
NationalAsian Pacific AmericanBar Association
Firm Address:
1612K StreetNW, Suite510
Washington,
D.C. 20006
Attorney CM/ECF
nsingh@napaba.org
Primary email address:
Firm Telephone:
202-775-9555
Firm Fax: 202-775-9333
Party Represented:
NationalAsian Pacific AmericanBar Association
Pamela Bunn
W.
Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing
1001BishopSt. Suite1800
Honolulu Hawaii 96813
Pursuant to LR 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, the undersigned
applies for an order permitting the above-named attorney to appear and participate as counsel pro hac vice for the above-named
party in all matters in the above-captioned case or proceeding. This request is based on the declaration of the attorney seeking to
appear pro hac vice.
Name/Address
of Local Counsel
March 11, 2017
Dated:
/s/ Pamela W. Bunn
Signature*
(Print name if original signature)
*If this motion is being signed by local counsel on behalf of the applicant, the signature constitutes consent to the
designation as associate counsel; otherwise such consent shall be filed separately.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?