State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 130

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Rachana A. Pathak Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-1841987.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachana A. Pathak, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela)

Download PDF
HID 007A (Rev. 02114) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the of Hawaii District STATE OF HAWAI'I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et. al, Case No. 1:17-CV-00050-DKW-KSC _ ) ) ) ) ) Defendant -------------------------------) MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Attach Declaration of Counsel in support of motion. $300.00 assessment required to be paid through Name of Attorney: Rachana A. Pathak Firm Name: Whittier Law School Firm Address: 3333 Harbor Blvd. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attorney CMlECF radha. Primary email address: Firm Telephone: 714-444-4141, ext. 231 Party Represented: National Asian Pacific American Bar Association Name/Address of Local Counsel Pamela W. Bunn Alston Floyd Hunt & lng 1800 Bishop Street Honolulu. Hawai'i 96813 1 Firm Fax: 1714-444-1854 Pursuant to LR 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, the undersigned applies for an order permitting the above-named attorney to appear and participate as counsel pro hac vice for the above-named party in all matters in the above-captioned case or proceeding. This request is based on the declaration ofthe attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice. March 11, 2017 Dated: /s/ Pamela W. Bunn Signature* (Print name if original signature) *Ifthis motion is being signed by local counsel on behalf of the applicant, the signature constitutes consent to the designation as associate counsel; otherwise such consent shall be filed separately.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?