State of Hawaii v. Trump
Filing
130
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Rachana A. Pathak Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-1841987.Pamela W. Bunn appearing for Amicus National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachana A. Pathak, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Bunn, Pamela)
HID 007A (Rev. 02114) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
of Hawaii
District
STATE OF HAWAI'I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as
President of the United States, et. al,
Case No.
1:17-CV-00050-DKW-KSC
_
)
)
)
)
)
Defendant
-------------------------------)
MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
(Attach Declaration of Counsel in support of motion. $300.00 assessment required to be paid through Pay.gov.)
Name of Attorney:
Rachana A. Pathak
Firm Name:
Whittier Law School
Firm Address:
3333 Harbor Blvd.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attorney CMlECF
radha. pathak@strismaher.com
Primary email address:
Firm Telephone:
714-444-4141, ext. 231
Party Represented:
National Asian Pacific American Bar Association
Name/Address
of Local Counsel
Pamela W. Bunn
Alston Floyd Hunt & lng
1800 Bishop Street
Honolulu. Hawai'i 96813
1 Firm Fax: 1714-444-1854
Pursuant to LR 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, the undersigned
applies for an order permitting the above-named attorney to appear and participate as counsel pro hac vice for the above-named
party in all matters in the above-captioned case or proceeding. This request is based on the declaration ofthe attorney seeking to
appear pro hac vice.
March 11, 2017
Dated:
/s/ Pamela W. Bunn
Signature*
(Print name if original signature)
*Ifthis motion is being signed by local counsel on behalf of the applicant, the signature constitutes consent to the
designation as associate counsel; otherwise such consent shall be filed separately.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?