State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 2

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Douglas S.G. Chin appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of TRO, # 2 Certificate with Word Count, # 3 Proposed TRO)(Chin, Douglas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; Civil Action No. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT Pursuant to Local Rule 7.5(e), I hereby certify that the foregoing Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is in Times New Roman, 14-point font and contains 8,910 words, exclusive of case caption, table of contents, table of authorities, and identifications of counsel, as reported by the word processing system used to produce the document. This word count is in compliance with the limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.5(b). 1 DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, February 3, 2017. /s/ Douglas S. Chin NEAL K. KATYAL* COLLEEN ROH SINZDAK* THOMAS P. SCHMIDT* SARA SOLOW* MITCHELL P. REICH* ELIZABETH HAGERTY* ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN* DOUGLAS S. CHIN (Bar No. 6465) Attorney General of the State of Hawai‘i CLYDE J. WADSORTH (Bar No. 8495) Solicitor General of the State of Hawai‘i DEIRDRE MARIE-IHA (Bar No. 7923) KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY (Bar No. 7813) DONNA H. KALAMA (Bar No. 6051) Deputy Attorneys General HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 637-5600 Fax: (202) 637-5910 Email: *Pro Hac Vice Applications Forthcoming DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Telephone: (808) 586-1500 Fax: (808) 586-1239 Email: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?