State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 238

MOTION to Convert Temporary Restraining Order to Preliminary Injunction Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal)

Download PDF
DOUGLAS S. CHIN (Bar No. 6465) Attorney General of the State of Hawai‘i DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Telephone: (808) 586-1500 Fax: (808) 586-1239 Attorneys for Plaintiff, State of Hawai‘i NEAL K. KATYAL* HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 637-5600 Fax: (202) 637-5910 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs, State of Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh (See Next Page For Additional Counsel) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050DKW-KSC PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONVERT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONVERT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; PROPOSED ORDER; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL CLYDE J. WADSWORTH (Bar No. 8495) Solicitor General of the State of Hawai‘i DEIRDRE MARIE-IHA (Bar No. 7923) DONNA H. KALAMA (Bar No. 6051) KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY (Bar No. 7813) ROBERT T. NAKATSUJI (Bar No. 6743) Deputy Attorneys General DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Telephone: (808) 586-1500 Fax: (808) 586-1239 Email: deirdre.marie-iha@hawaii.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff, State of Hawai‘i COLLEEN ROH SINZDAK* MITCHELL P. REICH* ELIZABETH HAGERTY* HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 637-5600 Fax: (202) 637-5910 Email: neal.katyal@hoganlovells.com THOMAS P. SCHMIDT* HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 918-3000 Fax: (212) 918-3100 SARA SOLOW* ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN* HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 1835 Market St., 29th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (267) 675-4600 Fax: (267) 675-4601 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs, State of Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh 2 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONVERT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Pursuant to Rules 7 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.2 for the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, Plaintiffs, the State of Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh, by and through counsel, hereby move this Honorable Court to convert its Temporary Restraining Order of March 15, 2017 to a Preliminary Injunction, prohibiting Defendants from enforcing and implementing Sections 2 and 6 of the March 6, 2017 Executive Order issued by Defendant Donald J. Trump (the “Executive Order”). Those provisions of the Executive Order, inter alia, impose a nationwide ban on the “entry” of foreign nationals from six Muslim-majority countries for 90 days, and suspend the United States Refugee Admissions Program for a period of 120 days. Plaintiffs previously moved for a temporary restraining order prohibiting the enforcement of Sections 2 and 6 of the Executive Order nationwide (Dkt. No. 65), and this Court entered a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) providing such relief on March 15, 2017. Dkt. No. 219. For the same reasons that this Court entered a TRO, it should convert the TRO to a preliminary injunction. This Court found that Plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that Sections 2 and 6 of the Executive Order inflict state-sanctioned discrimination towards Muslims in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Id. at 28-40. Additionally, Sections 2 and 6 of 3 the Executive Order violate the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., by discriminating on the basis of national origin and by contravening the INA’s finely reticulated system of immigration controls, and violate individuals’ Due Process Clause rights under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. These discriminatory and unlawful provisions of the Executive Order have no place in the State of Hawai‘i, where Defendants’ actions have caused, and continue to cause, irreparable injury to Plaintiffs. As an immediate remedy, and to maintain the status quo while more permanent solutions may be considered, Plaintiffs ask that the Court convert the Temporary Restraining Order entered on March 15, 2017, to a preliminary injunction, thereby enjoining Defendants from enforcing or implementing Sections 2 and 6 of the Executive Order nationwide. This motion is supported by the attached Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Convert Temporary Restraining Order to a Preliminary Injunction, an accompanying declaration and exhibits, and the records and files in this action, as well as any additional submissions and oral argument that may be considered by the Court. DATED: Washington, D.C., March 21, 2017. 4 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Neal K. Katyal DOUGLAS S. CHIN (Bar No. 6465) Attorney General of the State of Hawai‘i CLYDE J. WADSWORTH (Bar No. 8495) Solicitor General of the State of Hawai‘i DEIRDRE MARIE-IHA (Bar No. 7923) DONNA H. KALAMA (Bar No. 6051) KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY (Bar No. 7813) ROBERT T. NAKATSUJI (Bar No. 6743) Deputy Attorneys General DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I Attorneys for Plaintiff, State of Hawai‘i 5 NEAL K. KATYAL* COLLEEN ROH SINZDAK* MITCHELL P. REICH* ELIZABETH HAGERTY* THOMAS P. SCHMIDT* SARA SOLOW* ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN* HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP *Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs, State of Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?