State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 247

MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadephia, and Other Major Cities and Counties as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Convert the Temporary Restraining Order to a Preliminary Injunction (Dkt 238) Robert M. Kohn appearing for Amicus City and County of Honolulu (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Proposed Amici Curiae Brief, # 2 Appendix, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Kohn, Robert)

Download PDF
EDWARD N. SISKEL Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago BENNA RUTH SOLOMON* Deputy Corporation Counsel 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 744-7764 benna.solomon@cityofchicago.org *Pending Pro Hac Vice Motion Attorneys for Amicus Curiae, City of Chicago DONNA Y. L. LEONG, 3226 Corporation Counsel ROBERT M. KOHN, 6291 NICOLETTE WINTER, 9588 Deputies Corporation Counsel 530 S. King St., Room 110 Honolulu, HI 96813 (808) 768-5100 robert.kohn@honolulu.gov nwinter@honolulu.gov Attorneys for City and County of Honolulu IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I STATE OF HAWAI‘I, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050DKW-KSC MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF CHICAGO, LOS ANGELES, NEW YORK, PHILADELPHIA, AND OTHER MAJOR CITIES AND COUNTIES AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONVERT THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. 238) Hearing March 29, 2017, 9:30 a.m. Honorable Derrick K. Watson RYAN P. POSCABLO BRIAN NEFF ELIBERTY LOPEZ Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP 1330 Avenue of the Americas 6th Floor (212) 660-1030 rposcablo@rshc-law.com New York, NY 10019 NICK KAHLON Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP Three First National Plaza 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 2900 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 471-8700 nkahlon@rshc-law.com Attorneys for Amicus Curiae City of Chicago Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and other major U.S. cities and counties respectfully submit this motion for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in support of Plaintiffs’ motion to convert the temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction. 1. Amici include the largest cities and counties in the United States. Along with other cities across the country, our physical and economic security is damaged by Executive Order 13780, issued on March 6, 2017, and entitled “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” as we describe in our brief. 2. The proposed amicus brief explains how the Order’s discrimination on the basis of religion and national origin will significantly undermine the safety, economic well-being, and social cohesion in our communities and across the United States. 3. Plaintiffs have consented to this motion. Defendants take no position on our request to file an amicus brief. WHEREFORE, amici respectfully request that this Court grant them leave to file the amicus brief attached hereto. Dated: March 23, 2017 Respectfully submitted, s/Benna Ruth Solomon s/Robert M. Kohn EDWARD N. SISKEL Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago BENNA RUTH SOLOMON* Deputy Corporation Counsel 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 744-7764 benna.solomon@cityofchicago.org *Pending Pro Hac Vice Motion Attorneys for Amicus Curiae, City of Chicago RYAN P. POSCABLO BRIAN NEFF ELIBERTY LOPEZ Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 6th Floor New York, NY 10019 (212) 660-1030 rposcablo@rshc-law.com NICK KAHLON Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP Three First National Plaza 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 2900 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 471-8700 nkahlon@rshc-law.com DONNA Y. L. LEONG, 3226 Corporation Counsel ROBERT M. KOHN, 6291 NICOLETTE WINTER, 9588 Deputies Corporation Counsel 530 S. King St., Room 110 Honolulu, HI 96813 (808) 7685100 robert.kohn@honolulu.gov nwinter@honolulu.gov Attorneys for City and County of Honolulu Attorneys for Amicus Curiae, City of Chicago 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?