State of Hawaii v. Trump
Filing
277
Joint MOTION to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Resolution of Defendants' Appeal Brad P. Rosenberg appearing for Defendants John F. Kelly, Rex Tillerson, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States of America (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Rosenberg, Brad)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAI’I and
ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKWKSC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official
capacity as President of the United States;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official
capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX
TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; and the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay District Court
Proceedings Pending Resolution of Defendants’ Appeal, the files and records
herein, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’
joint motion shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED. All deadlines in this case,
including the Defendants’ deadline to file a response to the Second Amended
Complaint, the parties’ deadline to file a Scheduling Conference Statement
pursuant to Rule 16.2(b), and the deadline to hold a conference pursuant to Rule
26,1(a), are hereby STAYED. The Court also hereby CONTINUES the Rule 16
Scheduling Conference that had been set for April 18, 2017.
It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit, within fourteen days of
the final disposition of appellate proceedings, a joint status report proposing the
schedule for any further proceedings in this matter.
DATED: _____________________
______________________________
Derrick K. Watson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?