State of Hawaii v. Trump
Filing
37
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants, filed by State of Hawaii. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal) Modified docket text on 2/14/2017 (ecs, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civil No. 17-00050-DKW-KJM
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as
President of the United States; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official
capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX
TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on the dates and by the methods of service noted below,
a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint was served on the
following at their last known addresses:
Served Electronically through CM/ECF on February 13, 2017:
Florence T. Nakakuni, Esq.
florence.nakakuni@usdoj.gov
Edric Ming-Kai Ching
edric.ching@usdoj.gov
1
Michelle R. Bennett, Esq.
michelle.bennett@usdoj.gov
Brad P. Rosenberg, Esq.
brad.rosenberg@usdoj.gov
Daniel Schwei, Esq.
daniel.s.schwei@usdoj.gov
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, February 13, 2017.
/s/ Neal K. Katyal
NEAL K. KATYAL**
COLLEEN ROH SINZDAK*
MITCHELL P. REICH*
ELIZABETH HAGERTY**
THOMAS P. SCHMIDT*
SARA SOLOW*
ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN*
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
*Pro Hac Vice Applications
Forthcoming
**Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Plaintiffs State of
Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh
DOUGLAS S. CHIN (Bar No. 6465)
Attorney General of the State of Hawai‘i
CLYDE J. WADSWORTH (Bar No.
8495)
Solicitor General of the State of Hawai‘i
DEIRDRE MARIE-IHA (Bar No. 7923)
KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY (Bar No. 7813)
DONNA H. KALAMA (Bar No. 6051)
ROBERT T. NAKATSUJI (Bar No.
6743)
Deputy Attorneys General
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Hawai‘i
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?