State of Hawaii v. Trump
Filing
384
MOTION for Leave to File Response to Notice of In Camera, Ex Parte Lodging of Report Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiffs Ismail Elshikh, John Does 1 & 2, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc., State of Hawaii (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Response, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal) forwarded to MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S. CHANG
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAII and ISMAIL
ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civil No. 17-00050-DKW-KSC
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as
President of the United States; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; ELAINE DUKE, in her official
capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland
Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE;
REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE A RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF IN CAMERA, EX PARTE
LODGING OF REPORT CONTAINING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Response to
Notice of In Camera, Ex Parte Lodging of Report Containing Classified
Information (the “Motion”), the files and records herein, and good cause appearing
therefor;
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs State
of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, John Does 1 & 2, and the Muslim Association of
Hawaii, Inc. shall promptly file their Response to Notice of In Camera, Ex Parte
Lodging of Report Containing Classified Information.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, ______________.
______________________
Derrick K. Watson
U.S. District Judge
State of Hawaii, et al. v. Trump, et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKWKSC; [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF IN CAMERA, EX PARTE LODGING OF REPORT
CONTAINING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?