State of Hawaii v. Trump
Filing
57
Joint MOTION for Entry of Proposed Briefing Schedule Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiffs Ismail Elshikh, State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Katyal, Neal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL
ELSHIKH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050capacity as President of the United States;
DKW-KJM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his
official capacity as Secretary of Homeland
Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his
official capacity as Secretary of State; and
the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Proposed
Briefing Schedule Order, the files and records herein, and good cause appearing
therefor;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs will file their Second Amended Complaint, Motion for a
Temporary Restraining Order, and any declarations in support thereof on
March 8, 2017.
2. The Government will file its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for a
Temporary Restraining Order by 6 AM Hawaii Standard Time on March 13,
2017.
3. Plaintiffs will file a Reply by 12 Noon Hawaii Standard Time on March 14,
2017.
4. Both parties will appear at a hearing in this Court with telephonic access
available on the morning of March 15, 2017, at __ AM (Hawaii Standard
Time).
5. Plaintiffs may file a brief of up to 12,000 words in support of their Motion
for a Temporary Restraining Order, and the Government may file a brief of
up to 12,000 words in opposition to that motion.
DATED:
Honolulu, Hawai‘i, ___________.
_______________________
Derrick K. Watson
U.S. District Judge
State of Hawai‘i v. Trump, et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KJM;
[Proposed] BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?