The Idaho Republican Party v Ysursa

Filing 67

ORDER. The parties submitted electronic copies of depositions with the objections included as electronic sticky notes. The Court has written its rulings to the objections on those same electronic sticky notes. The Court will attach a print out of the relevant depositions pages, along with the electronic sticky notes, to this Order. These will constitute the Court's ruling on the objections. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (Attachments: # 1 Adams, # 2 Barrett, # 3 Beck, # 4 Bowers, # 5 Kulczyk, # 6 Mansfield, # 7 Maxwell, # 8 Ripley, # 9 Vance)(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Download PDF
The Idaho Republican Party v Ysursa Doc. 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ID A H O REPUBLICAN PARTY, et. al., v. C a s e No. 1:08-CV-165-BLW ORDER B E N YSURSA, in his official capacity as S e c re ta ry of State for the State of Idaho, Defendant. A bench trial in this matter is scheduled to commence on October 13, 2010. In p re p a ra tio n for that trial, Plaintiff Idaho Republican Party submitted trial depositions of a n u m b e r of witnesses. Defendants and Intervenors submitted their objections to portions o f those trial depositions. To facilitate an organized process for ruling on the objections, th e parties submitted electronic copies of the depositions in pdf format, with the o b je c tio n s included as electronic sticky notes. The Court has written its rulings to the o b je c tio n s on those same electronic sticky notes. The Court will attach a print out of the re le v a n t depositions pages, along with the electronic sticky notes, to this Order. These ORDER - 1 Dockets.Justia.com will constitute the Court's ruling on the objections. I T IS SO ORDERED. D A T E D : October 12, 2010 B. LYNN WINMILL C h ie f U.S. District Court Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?