EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.

Filing 100

MOTION by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for discovery schedule (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, proposed scheduling order# 2 Exhibit B, chart)(Mulaire, Justin)

EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.

Doc. 100 Att. 1

Case 1:05-cv-00208

Document 100-2

Filed 11/10/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 05 cv 0208 Judge James Zagel

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties complete pretrial activities in this action as follows: Completion Date March 30, 2006 May 16, 2007 Activity All written discovery complete, to be supplemented as required by Rule 26(e). EEOC identifies damage contentions, to be supplemented as permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. EEOC identifies comparators, to be supplemented as permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fact depositions complete. Expert reports on issues for which the serving party bears burden of proof or production due. Responses to Requests for Admission due. Responsive expert reports due. Expert depositions complete. Dispositive motions due. Responses to dispositive motions due. Replies in support of dispositive motions due. Proposed pretrial order due. Ready for trial. SO ORDERED: ______________________________ James B. Zagel United States District Judge

July 16, 2007 August 13, 2007

September 10, 2007 October 15, 2007 October 22, 2007 November 19, 2007 December 3, 2007 January 15, 2008 February 1, 2008

DATED: ___________________

Dockets.Justia.com