EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.

Filing 100

MOTION by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for discovery schedule (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, proposed scheduling order# 2 Exhibit B, chart)(Mulaire, Justin)

Download PDF
EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown. Doc. 100 Att. 1 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 100-2 Filed 11/10/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 05 cv 0208 Judge James Zagel ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties complete pretrial activities in this action as follows: Completion Date March 30, 2006 May 16, 2007 Activity All written discovery complete, to be supplemented as required by Rule 26(e). EEOC identifies damage contentions, to be supplemented as permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. EEOC identifies comparators, to be supplemented as permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fact depositions complete. Expert reports on issues for which the serving party bears burden of proof or production due. Responses to Requests for Admission due. Responsive expert reports due. Expert depositions complete. Dispositive motions due. Responses to dispositive motions due. Replies in support of dispositive motions due. Proposed pretrial order due. Ready for trial. SO ORDERED: ______________________________ James B. Zagel United States District Judge July 16, 2007 August 13, 2007 September 10, 2007 October 15, 2007 October 22, 2007 November 19, 2007 December 3, 2007 January 15, 2008 February 1, 2008 DATED: ___________________ Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?