EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.

Filing 107

MOTION by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for protective order governing subsequent employment information and documents (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, proposed Protective Order Governing Subsequent Employment Information and Documents# 2 Exhibit B, October 6, 2006 Transcript of Proceedings)(Mulaire, Justin)

Download PDF
EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown. Doc. 107 Att. 1 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 05 C 0208 Judge James Zagel PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS For the reasons stated in the Agreed Motion for a Protective Order filed on November 20, 2006, it appears that good cause exists for the entry of this Protective Order. In order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain documents and information to be produced with respect to former Sidley Austin LLP ("Sidley") partners who were informed of a change to counsel or senior counsel in late 1999 or on whose behalf the EEOC is seeking relief in this litigation ("Former Partners"), the Court hereby orders as follows: I. DEFINITIONS A. The term "Confidential Subsequent Employment Information" is defined as any of the following types of information: 1) Any equity or ownership interest that any Former Partner holds or has held in a law firms after his or her partner status at Sidley ended ("Subsequent Firms"); 105772 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 10 2) Hours any Former Partner has billed and/or charged to clients while affiliated with a Subsequent Firm; 3) Revenues generated from billings to clients any Former Partner originated, is responsible for, or for which a Former Partner is credited for purposes or determining the Former Partner's compensation; 4) Business any Former Partner has generated and clients any Former Partner has retained since leaving Sidley; 5) Business development efforts any Former Partner has engaged in since leaving Sidley; 6) Terms, conditions, duties, and/or responsibilities of any non-Sidley employment or self-employment held by any Former Partner after October 1999; or 7) Any other private, proprietary, or trade secret information pertaining to a Former Partner's employment or self-employment after October 1999. B. The term "Confidential Subsequent Employment Document" refers to a document that contains any of the above types of information defined as "Confidential Subsequent Employment Information," including but not limited to memoranda, databases, compilations and discovery responses that disclose such Confidential Subsequent Employment Information. C. As used herein, "disclosure" or "to disclose" shall mean to divulge, reveal, describe, summarize, paraphrase, quote, transmit, or otherwise directly communicate Confidential Subsequent Employment Information. 2 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 10 II. DISCLOSURE OF SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION A. For the reasons stated by the Court on October 6, 2006, and for the reasons set forth in the Agreed Motion for Protective Order filed on November 20, 2006, no Former Partner need disclose any Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents except as directed by a subsequent order of this court. III. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF CONFIDENTIAL SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION A. For purposes of production to Sidley, Former Partners shall produce one copy of a Confidential Subsequent Employment Document to the EEOC. B. The EEOC shall designate a document that it or a Former Partner determines in good faith to contain Confidential Subsequent Employment Information by (1) stamping the words "CONFIDENTIAL SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT DOCUMENT" on the document, or (2) using any other reasonable method agreed upon by the parties. C. If a party inadvertently fails to designate discovery material as Confidential Subsequent Employment Information, it may make the designation belatedly so long as it does so promptly after learning of the oversight. Counsel for the receiving parties shall take reasonably necessary steps to ensure the confidentiality of the Confidential Subsequent Employment Information, including reasonable efforts to secure return of the Confidential Information from individuals to whom disclosure was made but would not have been permitted by this Order had the Discovery Material been originally designated as Confidential Subsequent Employment Information. D. A party designating all or a portion of a document or record of a deposition or oral hearing Confidential ("Designated Material"), shall contemporaneously identify the subparagraph(s) of the definition of "Confidential Subsequent Employment Information" 3 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 4 of 10 (identified by paragraph and any subparagraph of § I.A) that support the designation. If the Designated Material is a record of a deposition or oral hearing and the designating party has determined that more than one paragraph or subparagraph of § I.A supports the designation, the designating party shall identify the portion(s) of the Designated Material to which each paragraph or subparagraph of § I.A applies. E. Sidley's outside counsel, Grippo & Elden LLC; Sidley's damages experts; the EEOC; and the EEOC's damages experts may each make one copy of Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents for use as permitted by this Order. F. The EEOC and Sidley may each designate one attorney and one legal assistant and one damages expert and one assistant (collectively "Designees") who shall be permitted to view the Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents, provided that any such Designee has agreed to abide by the terms and conditions of this Order by signing Exhibit A. No Designee shall be a current or former employee or current or former partner of Sidley Austin LLP or of its predecessor entities. Each party shall file a statement of designation with the Court, using the form attached as Exhibit B to this Order. G. Through the conclusion of trial in this matter, counsel for the parties shall store Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents in a locked file accessible only to Designees and those permitted by § III.H to have access to Confidential Subsequent Employment Information. H. In preparation for, and during the deposition of any Former Partner, Confidential Subsequent Employment Information and Documents may be shared with the EEOC and Sidley counsel taking or defending the deposition, as well as any private counsel retained by that Former Partner to assist or advise him or her in connection with this action. One copy of a 4 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 5 of 10 Confidential Subsequent Employment Document may be made for use as a deposition exhibit. However, prior to using any Confidential Subsequent Employment Document as an exhibit at a deposition, the parties shall confer in good faith to attempt to limit the disclosure of Confidential Subsequent Employment Information, including by redaction or a stipulation as to the relevant factual information contained in the document. I. Prior to the introduction of any Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents at a deposition, all persons except for Designees, those permitted by § III.H to have access to Confidential Subsequent Employment Information, and the court reporter shall be excluded from the deposition. A party may, on the record during a deposition, instruct the court reporter to mark any deposition transcript pages that the party in good faith believes contain Confidential Subsequent Employment Information as "Confidential Subsequent Employment Information." For purposes of this Order, deposition transcript pages so marked will be considered a Confidential Subsequent Employment Document. J. At the conclusion of a trial in this matter, the parties shall file the Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents under seal with the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 26.2. K. Within 90 days after the final completion of the litigation (including any appeals), the parties shall destroy Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents filed under seal with the Court or, upon request of the producer, return the Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents to the producer, except as required by applicable law and regulation. L. Confidential Subsequent Employment Information shall be disclosed or used only for the purpose of this litigation (including any appeals) and to the extent necessary to prosecute or defend this action. 5 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 6 of 10 M. Confidential Subsequent Employment Information associated with a Former Partner may be disclosed to any private attorney retained by that Former Partner to provide legal advice or assistance to the Former Partner in connection with this action. N. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Order, no Confidential Subsequent Employment Information shall be disclosed to any current or former partner, employee, or contractor of Sidley Austin, LLP, or of its predecessor entities. O. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Order, a Former Partner's right, if any, to disclose or authorize the disclosure of the Former Partner's own Confidential Subsequent Employment Information to any person or persons is not limited by this Order. P. Any portion of a deposition exhibit, pleading, discovery response, transcript, or other writing filed with the Court in this litigation that contains Confidential Subsequent Employment Information shall be filed as a restricted document, pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, in a sealed envelope labeled "CONFIDENTIAL RESTRICTED DOCUMENT FILED PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER." If the party filing such a restricted document believes that some or all of the Documents or Information contained in the filed restricted document should not be restricted, the party shall include a statement identifying such Documents or Information. The other party will be given the opportunity to respond to the filing party's statement prior to a Court ruling on whether, and what portion of, the filed Documents or Information shall remain restricted. A party receiving a restricted filing may object to the filing of some or all of such Documents or Information as a restricted document by submitting a similar statement. The filing party will be given the same opportunity to respond prior to a Court ruling. 6 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 7 of 10 Q. The parties shall make reasonable efforts to reach agreement on redacting, coding or otherwise removing Confidential Subsequent Employment Information to avoid the necessity of filing restricted documents or to allow documents to be unrestricted. Documents may be filed under normal Court procedures if the Confidential Subsequent Employment Information listed in Paragraph I.A of this Order has been redacted, coded or otherwise removed from the document. IV. SPECIAL PROVISION RELATING TO TAX RETURNS Pursuant to this Court's October 6, 2006 ruling, Former Partners shall produce copies of their income tax returns as sought by Sidley's subpoenas. Such tax returns may be shared with Sidley's outside counsel, Grippo & Elden LLC, counsel to the EEOC, and damages experts engaged by Sidley or by the EEOC in connection with this action. The returns may not be shared with any current or former employee or current or former partner of Sidley Austin LLP or of its predecessor entities, except that the amount of income reflected in such tax returns may be disclosed to Sidley client representatives who serve as in-house counsel for this litigation. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. in the case. B. This Order does not constitute a determination of the admissibility or evidentiary This Order does not limit the right of any party to object to the scope of discovery foundation for the documents or a waiver of any party's objections thereto. C. Within 90 days after the final completion of the litigation (including any appeals) all copies of Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents shall be returned to the person who disclosed them or (with that person's consent) destroyed, except as required by applicable law and regulations. Any documents not so returned and not destroyed will remain subject to this Order. 7 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 8 of 10 D. The designation of documents or information as Confidential Subsequent Employment Information or as Confidential Subsequent Employment Documents shall not be construed as a waiver of any applicable privilege or other immunities from discovery (including without limitation the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine) or as a concession by the designating party that such information is relevant or material to any issue or is otherwise discoverable. E. This Order shall continue indefinitely during and after this litigation, unless modified or terminated by order of this Court. F. The restrictions set forth in any of the preceding paragraphs shall not apply to Confidential Subsequent Employment Information that was, is, or becomes public knowledge in a manner other than by violation of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:____________________ ___________________________________ James B. Zagel, United States District Judge 8 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT A Statement of Confidentiality And Agreement To Abide By Protective Order By signing this document, I hereby certify that I have read the Protective Order Governing Subsequent Employment Information and Documents ("Order") issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, governing production and disclosure of certain documents related to the subsequent employment of former Sidley Austin, LLP partners in EEOC v. Sidley Austin, Case No. 05 CV 0208. I understand the Order and agree to be bound by and abide by its contents. I understand that pursuant to the Order, I am prohibited from disclosing Confidential Subsequent Employment Information to anyone. I submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of enforcing the Order. Signature Name Date 105772 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 107-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 05 C 0208 Judge James Zagel DESIGNATION OF PERSON(S) WITH ACCESS TO SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Section III.F of the Protective Order Governing Subsequent Employment Documents, entered on ______________, [PARTY NAME] hereby designates the following individuals as persons authorized to view Confidential Subsequent Employment Information: Designated Attorney: [Attorney Name] [Firm Name] [Business Address and Phone] Designated Expert: [Expert Name] [Expert Firm Name] [Expert Business Address and Phone] Designated Legal Assistant: [Legal Assistant Name] [Firm Name] [Business Address and Phone] Designated Expert Assistant: [Expert Assistant Name] [Expert Assistant Firm Name] [Expert Assistant Business Address and Phone] 105772

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?