EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.

Filing 152

MEMORANDUM by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in support of motion to compel, 114 (SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EEOC's MOTION TO COMPEL CLIENT COMPLAINT INFORMATION) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Moates deposition transcript (under seal only))(Mulaire, Justin)

Download PDF
EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown. Doc. 152 Case 1:05-cv-00208 Document 152 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SIDLEY AUSTIN, LLP, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 05 cv 0208 Judge James Zagel SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EEOC'S MOTION TO COMPEL CLIENT COMPLAINT INFORMATION In further support of the fact that in making decisions as to whom to strip of partnership status pursuant to the1999 Momentum Plan Sidley did not proceed on practice group or office by office basis, EEOC directs the Court's attention to the recent deposition testimony of G. Paul Moates. Mr. Moates's deposition was taken on March 29, 2007, after EEOC filed its Sur-SurReply in Support of its Motion to Compel Client Complaint Information. Mr. Moates, who has been a member of the firm's Executive Committee since 1989, testified as follows: <redacted> Deposition of Paul Moates at pp. 23-24, 85-86, attached as Exhibit A (exhibit filed under seal). Respectfully submitted, _s/ Justin Mulaire for Laurie Elkin_ Laurie S. Elkin Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 W. Madison St., Ste. 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) 353-7726 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?