EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.
Filing
47
RESPONSE in opposition to Defendant's Renewed Request for Reconsideration or Certification for Interlocutory Appeal (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Filing)(Hamilton, Deborah)
EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown.
Doc. 47 Att. 1
Case 1:05-cv-00208
Document 47-2
Filed 11/07/2005
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________________________________________) NOTICE OF FILING TO: Gary M. Elden Lynn H. Murray Gregory C. Jones John E. Bucheit Amanda McMurtrie Grippo & Elden LLC 111 S. Wacker Dr. Chicago, IL 60606
Civil No. 05 cv 0208 Judge Zagel Magistrate Ashman
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on Monday, November 7, 2005, EEOC filed the attached PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S RENEWED REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division at 219 South Dearborn, Chicago, Illinois, 60604. By: Deborah L. Hamilton Laurie Elkin Trial Attorneys United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 353-7649
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:05-cv-00208
Document 47-2
Filed 11/07/2005
Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Deborah Hamilton, an attorney, hereby certifies that she caused a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S RENEWED REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL to be faxed and mailed, postage pre-paid, on November 7, 2005, to counsel of record at the following address: To: Gary M. Elden Lynn H. Murray Gregory C. Jones John E. Bucheit Amanda McMurtrie Grippo & Elden 111 S. Wacker Dr. Chicago, IL 60606
Fax (312) 558-1195
________________________ Deborah L. Hamilton
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?