Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity et al v. NDR Concrete and Masonry, Inc.
Filing
25
MOTION by Plaintiff Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity to reopen case, MOTION by Plaintiff Laborers& #039; Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity for judgment (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wallace, Patrick)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LABORERS' PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ) ) ) ) NDR CONCRETE AND MASONRY, INC., an ) Illinois corporation, et al., ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter having come to be heard on the Motion of Plaintiffs Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund of the Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity and James S. Jorgensen to Reinstate and Confess Judgment, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. 2. That this matter is reinstated. That Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Plaintiffs and against Defendants Case No.: 07 C 6446 Judge Kendall
NDR Concrete & Masonry, Inc. and William C. Cunha in the amount of $6,871.16 representing the amounts due on the defaulted Installment Note and attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by Plaintiffs. 3. Defendants are hereby ordered to pay post-judgment interest on all amounts set
forth herein until they are paid to the Funds. ENTER: _________________________________ The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall United States District Court Judge
Date: _______________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?