Sandstrom Products Company v. Universal Building Products, Inc.

Filing 12

MOTION by Plaintiff Sandstrom Products Company for judgment, MOTION by Plaintiff Sandstrom Products Company for permanent injunction (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Judgment and Injunction)(Nahnsen, Mark)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Sandstrom Products Company Plaintiff v. Universal Building Products, Inc. Defendant ) ) Civil Action No.: 09-cv-1836 ) ) ) Judge St. Eve ) ) Magistrate Judge Keys ) ) MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Now comes Plaintiff SANDSTROM PRODUCTS COMPANY, by and through its attorneys, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and represents that the parties, having reached a settlement in the above captioned case, hereby moves this Court to enter the proposed Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction attached hereto. The proposed Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction has been signed by both Parties to this action. Respectfully submitted, SANDSTROM PRODUCTS COMPANY Date: April 29, 2009 s/ Mark J. Nahnsen Dennis M. McWilliams Mark J. Nahnsen BARNES & THORNBURG LLP One North Wacker Drive Suite 4400 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: 312 -357-1313 Facsimile: 312-759-5646 Attorneys for the Plaintiff -1- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing MOTION FOR ENTRY CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION has been served via by electronic means as part of the Court's electronic case filing system under Local Rule 5.9 and by First Class Mail, properly addressed, postage prepaid, to: John T. Wiedemann Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP 1400 KeyBank Center 800 Superior Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2688 216-622 -8282 Direct 216-241 -0816 Facsimile on this 29th day of April, 200 9. s/ Mark J. Nahnsen CHDS01 JWAPPEL 377763v1 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?