Specht et al v. Google Inc et al

Filing 145

MOTION by Counter Claimant Google Inc to compel Plaintiffs To Provide Complete Responses To Interrogatories And Memorandum In Support (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Finn, Herbert)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ERICH SPECHT, an individual and doing business as ANDROID DATA CORPORATION, and THE ANDROID'S DUNGEON INCORPORATED, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09-cv-2572 Judge Harry D. Leinenweber Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 3, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, I shall appear before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber, in the room usually occupied by him as a Courtroom in the U.S. Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, or in his absence, before such other Judge who may be sitting in his place and stead and hearing motions, and shall then and there present Plaintiffs' Motion To Strike And Dismiss Counterclaims. Respectfully submitted, ERICH SPECHT, an individual and doing business as ANDROID DATA CORPORATION, and THE ANDROID'S DUNGEON INCORPORATED By: /s/ John F. Shonkwiler One of Their Attorneys P. Andrew Fleming John F. Shonkwiler John Haarlow, Jr. NOVACK AND MACEY LLP 100 North Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 419-6900 Doc. #316242 Martin J. Murphy 2811 RFD Long Grove, IL 60047 (312) 933-3200 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE John Haarlow, Jr., an attorney, certifies that he caused copies of the foregoing Notice of Motion to be served by electronically filing the document with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system this 20th day of November, 2009. /s/ John Haarlow, Jr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?