Specht et al v. Google Inc et al
Filing
172
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiffs Android Data Corporation, Erich Specht, The Android's Dungeon Incorporated to Compel (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Haarlow, John)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ERICH SPECHT, an individual and doing business as ANDROID DATA CORPORATION, and THE ANDROID'S DUNGEON INCORPORATED, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 09-cv-2572 Judge Harry D. Leinenweber Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole
NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 23, 2010, at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, I shall appear before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber, in the room usually occupied by him as a Courtroom in the U.S. Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, or in his absence, before such other Judge who may be sitting in his place and stead and hearing motions, and shall then and there present Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike, Or In The Alternative, File Sur-Reply Instanter. Respectfully submitted, ERICH SPECHT, an individual and doing business as ANDROID DATA CORPORATION, and THE ANDROID'S DUNGEON INCORPORATED By: /s/ John Haarlow, Jr. One of Their Attorneys
P. Andrew Fleming John F. Shonkwiler John Haarlow, Jr. NOVACK AND MACEY LLP 100 North Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 419-6900
Doc. #316242
Martin J. Murphy 2811 RFD Long Grove, IL 60047 (312) 933-3200
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE John Haarlow, Jr., an attorney, certifies that he caused copies of the foregoing Notice of Motion to be served by electronically filing the document with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system this 19th day of February, 2010.
/s/ John Haarlow, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?