Specht et al v. Google Inc et al
Filing
38
First AMENDED complaint by Erich Specht against all defendants and terminating Atheros Communications; Audience; Borqs; Ericsson; Huawei Technologies; Myriad; Noser Engineering Inc; Packet Video (PV); Qualcomm Inc; Samsung Electronics; SkyPop; SoniVox; Sony Ericsson; Sprint Nextel; Telecom Italia; Telefonica; Toshiba Corporation; Vodafone; Wind River; AKN Semiconductor and ARM (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L)(Murphy, Martin)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.2 Eastern Division Erich Specht, et al. Plaintiff, v. Google Inc, et al. Defendant. Case No.: 1:09-cv-02572 Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber
NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, June 4, 2009: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:Status hearing held and continued to 7/22/2009 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs' Motion for leave to file first amended complaint is granted. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction is withdrawn. Hearing stricken. Under the conditions set forth in open court, plaintiff and defendant Google allowed to conduct limited discovery.Mailed notice(wp, )
ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information. For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?