Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Vanguard Services, Inc. et al
Filing
6
MOTION by Plaintiffs Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Helath and Welfare Fund, Howard McDougall for judgment Agreed Consent Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Franczyk, John)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND; and HOWARD McDOUGALL, Trustee; ) ) ) ) and ) ) CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND ) SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH AND ) WELFARE FUND; and HOWARD ) McDOUGALL, Trustee; ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) VANGUARD SERVICES, INC., an Indiana ) corporation; DRIVER'S, INC., an Ohio ) corporation; VANGUARD SOUTHEAST, ) INC., a South Carolina corporation; VMT ) VANGUARD COMPANIES, INC., an ) Indiana corporation; VANGUARD ) SERVICES (CANADA), INC., a Canadian ) corporation; VANGUARD OF DELAWARE, ) INC., a Delaware corporation; CROSSSTONE, ) LLC, an Indiana limited liability company; ) PINERIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ) a Barbados corporation; V.O. FREIGHT ) SERVICES, INC, a Delaware corporation; ) ) Defendants. )
Case No. 09 C 4721 Judge George W. Lindberg Magistrate Judge Morton Denlow
CONSENT JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs filed their complaint on August 4, 2009; and WHEREAS, each of the Defendants hereby waives service of process; and WHEREAS, the parties consent to the entry of judgment as below set forth.
F:304127 / 305829 / 8/6/09
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties consent and stipulate to and the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 1. Plaintiff Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (the
"Pension Fund") is a multiemployer pension plan within the meaning of sections 3(2), 3(37) and 4001(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(2), 1002(37) and 1301(a)(3). 2. Plaintiff Howard McDougall is a present trustee of the Pension Fund and he
and his fellow trustees are the plan sponsor of the Pension Fund within the meaning of ERISA § 4001(a)(10), 29 U.S.C. § 1301(a)(10). He and his fellow trustees administer the Pension Fund at 9377 West Higgins Road, Rosemont, Cook County, Illinois. 3. Pursuant to ERISA §§ 502(a)(3), 515, 4221(b)(2), and 4301(a)(1), 29 U.S.C. §§
1132(a)(3), 1401(b)(2) and 1451(a)(1), the trustees of the Pension Fund, by and through their designated trustee Howard McDougall, are authorized to bring this action on behalf of the Pension Fund, its participants and beneficiaries. 4. Plaintiff Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare
Fund (the "Health and Welfare Fund") is a multiemployer welfare plan within the meaning of ERISA §§ 3(1) and 3(37), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(1) and 1002(37). 5. Plaintiff Howard McDougall is a present trustee of the Health and Welfare
Fund. He and his fellow trustees administer the Health and Welfare Fund at 9377 West Higgins Road, Rosemont, Cook County, Illinois.
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
-2-
6.
Pursuant to ERISA §§ 502(a)(3) and 515, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(3) and 1145,, the
trustees of the Health and Welfare Fund, by and through their designated trustee Howard McDougall, are authorized to bring this action on behalf of the Health and Welfare Fund, its participants and beneficiaries. 7. Defendant Vanguard Services, Inc. ("Vanguard") is an Indiana corporation
with its principal place of business located in the State of Indiana, and is an "employer" and a "party in interest" as those terms are defined, respectively, by ERISA §§ 3(5) and 3(14)(c), 29 U.S.C. §§1002(5) and 1002(14)(c). 8. Defendant Drivers, Inc. ("DI") is an Ohio corporation that at all relevant times
has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard. 9. Defendant Vanguard Southeast, Inc. ("VSE") is a South Carolina corporation
that at all relevant times has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard. 10. Defendant VMT Vanguard Companies, Inc. ("VMT") is an Indiana
corporation that at all relevant times has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard. 11. Defendant Vanguard Services (Canada), Inc. ("VANC") is a Canadian
corporation that at all relevant times has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard. 12. 13. Defendant Vanguard of Delaware, Inc. ("VOD") is a Delaware corporation. At all relevant times James W. Malarney and Ronald D. Creager have owned,
directly and indirectly, 100 percent of the voting stock of both Vanguard and VOD. 14. Defendant CrossStone, LLC ("CSS") is an Indiana limited liability company
that at all relevant times has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of VOD. -3-
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
15.
Defendant Pineridge Insurance Company, Inc. ("PINE") is a Barbados
corporation that at all relevant times has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of VOD. 16. Defendant V.O. Freight Services, Inc. ("VOF") is South Carolina corporation
that at all relevant times has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of VOD. 17. Vanguard was bound by certain collective bargaining agreements and
participation agreements executed by and between itself and Local Unions affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. 18. Pursuant to those collective bargaining agreements and participation
agreements, Vanguard agreed to pay contributions to the Pension Fund and the Health and Welfare Fund on behalf of certain covered employees. 19. Vanguard owes $10,978.20 in contributions and $563.01 in interest (through
July 31, 2009) to the Pension Fund . These contributions are owed as the result of severance pay paid in July 2008 to certain participants covered under a collective bargaining agreement and a participation agreement between Vanguard and Teamsters Local Union No. 528. 20. Vanguard owes $14,995.80 in contributions and $769.47 in interest (through
July 31, 2009) to the Health and Welfare Fund . These contributions are owed as the result of severance pay paid in July 2008 to certain participants covered under a collective bargaining agreement and a participation agreement between Vanguard and Teamsters Local Union No. 528.
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
-4-
21.
Vanguard triggered a complete withdrawal under ERISA § 4203, 29 U.S.C.
§ 1383 from the Pension Fund in 2008 (the "Withdrawal"). 22. On the date of the Withdrawal, Vanguard, VSE, DI, VMT, VANC, VOD, CSS,
PINE, and VOF (the "Vanguard Controlled Group") were trades or businesses under common control within the meaning of ERISA § 4001(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1301(b)(1), and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 23. As a result of the Withdrawal, each member of the Vanguard Controlled
Group, jointly and severally, has incurred withdrawal liability to the Pension Fund in the principal amount of $4,769,353.60, as determined pursuant to ERISA §§ 4201 and 4211, 29 U.S.C. § 1381 and 1391 (the "Withdrawal Liability"). 24. On July 28, 2009, the Pension Fund issued a notice and demand to the
Vanguard Controlled Group for payment of the Withdrawal Liability in accordance with ERISA §§ 4202(2) and 4219(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1382(2) and 1399(b)(1), which was received by the Vanguard Controlled Group, through Vanguard, on July 29, 2009 (the "Assessment"). 25. The notice and attached invoice notified the Vanguard Controlled Group that
it was required to discharge its liability in a lump sum payment on or before August 1, 2009, pursuant to ERISA § 4219(c)(5)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1399(c)(5)(B), and Appendix E, Section 5(e)(2)(E) of the Central States Pension Plan. 26. The Vanguard Controlled Group has not paid the withdrawal liability due
to the Pension Fund. -5-
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
27.
Each member of the Vanguard Controlled Group waives the right to request
review of the Assessment pursuant to ERISA § 4219, 29 U.S.C. § 1399, to initiate arbitration with respect to the assessment pursuant to ERISA § 4221, 29 U.S.C. § 1401, or to otherwise challenge the Assessment. 28. Both the Pension Fund Trust Agreement and the Health and Welfare Trust
Agreement provide for post-judgment interest due from the date the judgment is entered until the date of payment computed and charged on the entire judgment balance at an annualized interest rate equal to two percent (2%) plus the prime interest rate established by JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA for the fifteenth (15th) day of the month for which the interest is charged compounded annually. 29. 30. Each Defendant waives service of process. Each Defendant consents to personal jurisdiction and venue in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 31. Judgment. 32. Each Defendant waives the right to appeal this Consent Judgment. Each Defendant consents to the immediate registration of this Consent
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: A. That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs, the Central States, Southeast
and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall, trustee, and against the Defendant Vanguard Services, Inc. for $10,978.20 in contributions, and $563.01 in interest
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
-6-
(through July 31, 2009) awarded pursuant to ERISA §§ 502(g)(2) and 515, 29 U.S.C.§§ 1132(g)(2) and 1145. B. That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs, the Central States, Southeast
and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall, trustee, and against the Defendants Vanguard Services, Drivers, Inc., Vanguard Southeast, Inc., VMT Vanguard Companies, Inc., Vanguard Services (Canada), Inc., Vanguard of Delaware, Inc., CrossStone, LLC, Pineridge Insurance Company, Inc., and V.O. Freight Services, Inc., jointly and severally, in the amount of $4,769,353.60, awarded pursuant to ERISA §§ 502(g)(2) and 4301(b), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(g)(2) and 1451(b). C. That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs, the Central States, Southeast
and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Howard McDougall, trustee, and against the Defendant Vanguard Services, Inc., for $14,995.80 and $769.47 in interest (through July 31, 2009) awarded pursuant to ERISA §§ 502(g)(2) and 515, 29 U.S.C.§§ 1132(g)(2) and 1145. D. Plaintiffs are awarded post-judgment interest from the date the judgment is
entered until the date of payment computed and charged on the entire judgment balance at an annualized interest rate equal to two percent (2%) plus the prime interest rate established by JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA for the fifteenth (15th) day of the month for which the interest is charged compounded annually. E. This Consent Judgment shall not bar an action by the Plaintiffs against any
of the Defendants under the doctrine of claim preclusion (res judicata) or issue preclusion -7-
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
(collateral estoppel) for any claim for contributions other than for the contributions due as a result of the severance payments identified in paragraphs 19 and 20, or for any claim for withdrawal liability other than for the Assessment as identified in paragraph 24. F. That Plaintiffs are awarded execution for the collection of the judgment and
cost granted hereunder and may immediately register the judgment. G. Defendants waive their right to appeal this Consent Judgment.
APPROVED: CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and HOWARD McDOUGALL, trustee
By: Title: Date:
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, and HOWARD McDOUGALL, trustee
By: Title: Date:
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
-8-
VANGUARD SERVICES, INC., an Indiana corporation
By: Title: Date: DRIVER'S, INC., an Ohio corporation
By: Title: Date:
VANGUARD SOUTHEAST, INC., a South Carolina corporation
By: Title: Date:
VMT VANGUARD COMPANIES, INC., an Indiana corporation
By: Title: Date: -9-
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
VANGUARD SERVICES (CANADA), INC., a Canadian corporation
By: Title: Date:
VANGUARD OF DELAWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation
By: Title: Date:
CROSSSTONE, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company
By: Title: Date:
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
-10-
PINERIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., a Barbados corporation By: Title: Date:
V.O. FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., a South Carolina corporation
By: Title: Date: ENTERED:
United States District Judge
Date:
F :3 0 4 1 2 7 / 305829 / 8/6/09
-11-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?