Huon v. Breaking Media et al

Filing 14

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Meanith Huon Exhibits G through M regarding amended complaint 12 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit G, # 2 Exhibit H, # 3 Exhibit I, # 4 Exhibit J, # 5 Exhibit K, # 6 Exhibit L, # 7 Exhibit M)(Huon, Meanith)

Download PDF
ro,z9 vie$s, l4ay u 2ou 645 PM LAWSUITS a Mel Gibmn's GayBrotherComes To His Dedense :t BadasswidtitaAbortionDoctor R€sponds Death Thrrats witl to Lightning Bolt Car FFFoFonnl l.in currnon-A Chicagoman who was f,l acquitted on a ser<ual assault drarge is suing ttre legal blog AboveThe Law for implying that he's a serial rapist. If Meanith Huon gets his way, blogger sloppinessmay cost ATL $So million. Huon, a lawyer, was initially charyedwith two counts ofsexual assault,two counts ofsexual abuse,ald one count ofunlalrfirl restraint. A woman had jumped out of his car, ran through a cornfield barefoot, and knocked on a random person'sdoor sayinghe had forced her into sexualactivity, Shelater said she believedshe was spending time with him for a job opportunity related to alcohol promotions, until he allegedlyyelled atherto perforrn oral sex. , t Huon's version was that it was a consensual encounter, and partly on the strength ofa bartendet's testimony that the woman had been drinking and askedwhere to go to have fun, the l jurybelieved him. . I AdchoresF (r OctomomAndBruodwr€ak Abslme H8t/ocO'nLfiD Television ...thatcancarnyouSl00crsh blckf z SsienceExplainsWhyYou'rc Undaunted Dy Ifiller Hangovers I ro AreWomen Undernporting Rap€sAsA Result OfThe Dominique Strauss-KahnCase? l,awyer Sueslregal Blog For $So M Over RapeStory [ForbesJ Related: RapePotpurri [ATL] sarahttlc All Ni"t toes (alSarahMC rr Bylhe GraceofJersryCo4 Vlnn/s Backon Jerscy Shorc rz Srrah Palin Declalts SheCa! Win on Ner,vslveek Cov€r r3 Adorable Kitten PlaS'e Invisible Piano r+ Model Hainln-Face Epidemic GivesEveryone'sMom an Ancu$€m rS FireUpTheRoyalWind Mactrine 16 Australian Muslim Women l\rho Dotr't Show Faceto PoliceFace JailTime r7 lte Many Shadee Socoer of Celebrrtion 18 Can Kate MiddletonBrin8 Back Pantybose? Start a newthread rr Mayzou 9:16PM Just becausea man is acquifted of rape do€snot mean he did not commit rape. That a jury would decide "not guilty" doesnot magically erasewhat he did-if he di{ in fact, rape someone.The vast majority of rapists are never convicted of rape. Doesthat make them not rapists? f,l CiadaArrives Fmma Space Bwiness Meaing Jugt in Ttme to OverpmnounceItalian Words at PdoMaterh 9 Bac.bsannStnsAnti-Porn PledgeSaying'BlaclaWere DetterOfr During Slavety 'And this, people,is why God invented Google,"wrote Mystal in the original post, linking to articles that in fact describedthe samecase.The lessonlearned: Googleonlytakes you so far. Featurcd + The KissCan" Demygtified Totally Over 5 YotrngerGeneratiron Soq ProclaimsSomeonein Ol&rGenention Huon is also suing local law enforcement ' authorities in Madison County, Illinois for prosecutorial misconduct. His beef with Above . The Iaw sternsfrom a roundup post entitled "Rape Potpurri,' in which blogger Elie Mptal mistakenlybelieves that news accountsofthe ] sameincident are different incidents that r Shouldhavetipped the wOmanoffthat HUon ' lrrnpuelraohprndlda3d6{1p151$ts was a serial offender. 'The content ofthe article were [sic] defamatory in that it incorrectly and recklesslyportrayed Mr. Huon as a serial rapist by treating the samecomplaining witness as three different women," saysthe complaint, according to Forbes. {i.{ LOGIN r SundayNightshenanigans Man Acquitted Of Sexual Assault SuesBlog For Calling Him Serial Rapist DISCUSSION THREADS POPUI.AR rq thelrresfisd Dewloptnent Movie Is Happening People zo TOMS Digtancea ltsdf Flom FausOnTheFamily zr Taiwan'sfuneral strippers <hre frradcadcmrmil zs Should SchoolsTell Childttn Itqr'rcOvew{htr AnAri4ry, Ami-Choice Gmup? (Upd*ed) cuilty. As he wasn't proven guilty, he's not considereda rapist. ro Things You Mry Have Missed OnTVThisWeek If he is a rapist, the facts will showthat. If not, bes innoent. The Very, Very Scientific Benefte Of Naked Yoga BringerofthePain @SarahMC the BestVid@6 of the Week No, but it doesmeanthatyou cau't callthem rapists withoutbeing sued"Ifs merelythe differene betweenwhat they are and what they can be identified as in public. You can think he's a rapisttoyourhearts @ntent, butyou ean't print it. taylvie3@SarahMC No, but someonefound not guilty is innocent in the eyesofthe law. Ca[ing them ditrerently on ablog opensyouuptoalihlsuit. Iluthwouldbe adefenseina libel suit,butthat would mean r3tryingacriminal caseina civillibellawsuitto prevent paying $5oM. ffi SarahMC @BringerofthePain I understand that, but manypeople here are saying if a jurydoesn't find a person guiltyof something, it meansthey didnt do it, which is not tnre. For instance,Nickr693 aboveyou just said if he's a rapist the facts will show i1--1'[is[ rgnin, is not true. The hcts might very wel showit, butbecausetiewomanwent outtogetdrun\ thosefrcts aredismissed. am not I confusedabout what can and cannot be printed" I an confusedby the view that ifthe courts don't convict someone,s/he rnust not have done it. ! girlfriend! @Nickr693 Dino.unr. and Nachos, Innocent until proven guiltyis a widelymisunderstood concept.It basicallymeansthat tbe merEfact that someoneiE charyedwith a crime is not itself widence that the person committed acrime. Thenlougo tocourt Incourt, therewillbe evidencepresented.This evidenceiswhere an actua[ legal determination is made. Nobody is declared"innocent" in a court of law, they are founil guiltyor not Cuilty. T.Iot guilty'' is absolutely ae1ths samgthing as ninno@nt"from a legal standpoint. Thoae words do not mean the samething in the world of law. "Innocent until pnovenguilty'' is merclya conceptfor laynen to tryto keep their non-lawyerbrains ftom jumpingto (nonlegal) conclusions. Hide 5 replies About Help Forums Jobs lcgal Privacy PemissionsAdvertising SubscribeSendatip

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?