Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.
Filing
294
DECLARATION of Rafey S. Balabanian regarding motion to compel 293 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L)(Thomassen, Benjamin)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
MIKE HARRIS and JEFF DUNSTAN,
individually and on behalf of a class of
similarly situated individuals,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 1:11-cv-5807
Hon. James F. Holderman
Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim
COMSCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
DECLARATION OF RAFEY S. BALABANIAN IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS JEFF DUNSTAN’S AND MIKE HARRIS’S
MOTION TO COMPEL THE DEPOSITION OF MAGID ABRAHAM
I, Rafey S. Balabanian, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, hereby declare as follows:
1.
I am a Partner at the law firm of Edelson LLC, which has been retained to
represent Plaintiffs Mike Harris and Jeff Dunstan (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in this matter. I am
an adult over the age of 18 and am fully competent to make this Declaration. I have personal
knowledge of all matters set forth herein. If called upon to testify as to the matters stated herein, I
could and would competently do so.
2.
Following their initial review of comScore’s document production on merits
issues, Plaintiffs scheduled and took the depositions of five comScore employees: (i) Steven
Chase, Director of Software Engineering; (ii) Glenn Marchione, Senior Director of Quality
Assurance; (iii) Yvonne Bigbee, Senior Vice President of Technology; (iv) John O’Toole, Vice
President of Panel Operations; and (v) Latoya Peterson-Renfrow, Panel Operations Manager.
These depositions took place on November 13, 14, 20, 21, and 22 respectively.
3.
Based on Plaintiffs’ further review of comScore’s document production—and
later confirmed through testimony obtained during this first round of depositions on merits
issues—Plaintiffs served on comScore notices for the depositions of four more comScore
employees, including Chief Executive Officer, Magid Abraham, on November 1, 2013. (See
Notice of Deposition of Magid Abraham, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.) Plaintiffs also noticed the depositions of Chris Lin (General Counsel), Richard
Weaver (Deputy Privacy Officer), and Joshua Chasin (Chief Research Officer). Of these four
witnesses, comScore produced two for depositions—Richard Weaver and Joshua Chasin—but
refuse to produce Magid Abraham and Chris Lin.
4.
Plaintiffs’ counsel deposed Richard Weaver and Joshua Chasin on December 3,
2013 and December 13, 2013, respectively.
5.
In a letter dated November 18, 2013, comScore formally objected to the noticed
depositions of Magid Abraham and Chris Lin (See November 18, 2013 Letter, a true and
accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B) and stated that it would not produce Mr.
Abraham or Ms. Lin for deposition.
6.
Following discussions with comScore’s counsel, Plaintiffs have elected not to
pursue the deposition of Ms. Lin at this time.
7.
On November 21, 2013, Plaintiffs deposed comScore’s Vice President of Panel
Operations, John O’Toole.
(See CS0043028_ Confidential--Attorney's
Eyes Only.pdf, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C.)
2
(See excerpts from the November 21, 2013 deposition of John O’Toole, comScore’s Vice
President of Panel Operations, true and accurate copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit
D.)
8.
In a November 27, 2013 email to comScore, Plaintiffs outlined their reasons for
seeking Mr. Abraham’s testimony notwithstanding comScore’s objections. (See November 27,
2013 Email to comScore, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E.)
There, Plaintiffs explained that (i) Mr. Abraham played an important role in comScore’s
decisions regarding its data collection practices, (ii) these early and ongoing decisions are crucial
to their claims in this case, and (iii) Mr. Abraham was therefore best suited to testify about such
decisions at comScore.
9.
On December 4, 2013, the Parties met and conferred telephonically regarding Mr.
Abraham’s noticed deposition. During the call, Plaintiffs explained that Mr. Abraham’s
deposition was necessary because, inter alia, comScore had refused to produce any individuals
capable of testifying to the decision-making processes at comScore—despite Plaintiffs’ intent to
obtain this discovery as evinced by their 30(b)(6) deposition notice and the topics identified
therein. (See comScore’s response to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition, a true and
accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit F.)
10.
In a December 6, 2013 email, comScore reiterated its objections to Mr.
Abraham’s deposition, but also agreed to produce a Rule 30(b)(6) designee capable of testifying
about the “decision-making” topics Plaintiffs sought to discover. (See December 6, 2013 email, a
true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit G.)
11.
On December 13, 2013, Plaintiffs’ deposed comScore’s Chief Research Officer,
3
Joshua Chasin.
(See
CS0083728_Confidential--Attorney's Eyes Only.pdf, a true and accurate copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit H.)
12.
In a letter dated December 17, 2013, Plaintiffs’ counsel expressed to comScore
that—given Mr. Chasin’s testimony and among other reasons—they intended to move forward
with Mr. Abraham’s deposition. (See December 17, 2013 Letter to comScore, a true and accurate
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit I.) Plaintiffs’ counsel additionally informed
comScore that they believed the Parties had exhausted their meet and confer obligations
regarding the noticed deposition of Mr. Abraham, and intended to move the Court to compel his
testimony.
13.
Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and accurate copy of a document marked as
“CS0076479_Confidential--Attorney’s Eyes Only.htm,” which comScore provided to Plaintiffs
as a part of its September 2013 document production.
14.
Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and accurate copy of a document marked as
“CS0036962_Confidential--Attorney’s Eyes Only.htm,” which comScore provided to Plaintiffs
as a part of its September 2013 document production.
15.
Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and accurate copy of a document marked as
4
“CS0096521_Confidential--Attorney’s Eyes Only.htm,” which comScore provided to Plaintiffs
as a part of its November 2013 document production.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 20th day of December 2013 at Chicago, Illinois.
s/ Rafey S. Balabanian
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Benjamin S. Thomassen, an attorney, certify that on December 20, 2013, I served the
above and foregoing Declaration of Rafey S. Balabanian in Support of Plaintiffs Jeff
Dunstan’s and Mike Harris’s Motion to Compel the Deposition of Magid Abraham, by
causing true and accurate copies of such paper to be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record
via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system, on this 20th day of December 2013.
s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?