Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 46

DECLARATION of Ray Sardo regarding response in opposition to motion 45 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Somvichian, Whitty)

EXHIBIT C

Case5:10-cv-02389-JW Document18

1

Filed07/27/10 Page1 of 4

JAY EDELSON ([e-mail])
MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER
([e-mail])
BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN
([e-mail])
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
([e-mail])
BENJAMIN H. KLEINE (257225)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.

9

12

NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
KASSRA P. NASSIRI (215405) ([e-mail])
CHARLES H. JUNG (217909) ([e-mail])
251 Kearny Street, Suite 501
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff MIKE ROBERTSON

2
3
4
5
6

10
11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21

SAN JOSE DIVISION
DAVID GOULD, an individual, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

MIKE ROBERTSON, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,

24
25
26
27
28

No. 10-cv-02389 JW (PVT)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1(a))
Courtroom: 8
Judge:
James Ware
Trial Date: None Set

Defendant.

22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID GOULD

No. 10-cv-02408 JW (PVT)

Plaintiff,
v.
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
NO. 10-CV-02389 JW (PVT); 10-CV-02408 JW (PVT)

Case5:10-cv-02389-JW Document18

Filed07/27/10 Page2 of 4

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs David Gould and Mike Robertson

2

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Plaintiffs and Facebook

3

collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

WHEREAS the complaint in Gould v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-02389-JW
(“Gould”) was filed on May 28, 2010;
WHEREAS the complaint in Robertson v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-02408-JF
(“Robertson”) was filed on June 1, 2010;
WHEREAS the Court (Ware, D.J.), on July 26, 2010, ordered Gould and Robertson to be
related;
WHEREAS the current deadline for Facebook to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise
respond to the Complaint in Gould and the Complaint in Robertson is July 30, 2010;

12

WHEREAS under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a

13

Court order, to extend the time within which to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to

14

the Complaint; AND

15

WHEREAS extending the date for Facebook to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise

16

respond to the complaints to and including August 13, 2010 will not alter the date of any event or

17

deadline already fixed by Court order;

18

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

19

1.

20
21
22
23

Facebook’s deadline to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the

Complaint in Gould is extended to and including August 13, 2010.
2.

Facebook’s deadline to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the

Complaint in Robertson is extended to and including August 13, 2010.
IT IS SO STIPULATED. (Signatures on following page.)

24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
NO. 10-CV-02389 JW (PVT); 10-CV-02408 JW (PVT)

Case5:10-cv-02389-JW Document18

1

Dated: July 27, 2010

Filed07/27/10 Page3 of 4

COOLEY LLP

2
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.

3
4
5

Dated: July 27, 2010

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC

6
7

/s/ Michael J. Aschenbrener
Michael J. Aschenbrener (pro hac vice pending)
Attorneys for Plaintiff David Gould

8
9
10

Dated: July 27, 2010

NASSIRI & JUNG LLP

11
12
13

/s/ Kassra P. Nassiri
Kassra P. Nassiri
Attorneys for Plaintiff Mike Robertson

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
NO. 10-CV-02389 JW (PVT); 10-CV-02408 JW (PVT)

Case5:10-cv-02389-JW Document18

Filed07/27/10 Page4 of 4

FILER’S ATTESTATION

1
2
3

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that

4

all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to

5

Complaint (L.R. 6-1(a)).

6
7

Dated: July 27, 2010

/s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
NO. 10-CV-02389 JW (PVT); 10-CV-02408 JW (PVT)