First Midwest Equipment Finance Co. v. Morris et al
Filing
11
MOTION by Plaintiff First Midwest Equipment Finance Co. for judgment by default (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Wright, Alexander)
First Midwest Equipment Finance Co. v. Lenn Morris and Ricky Freeman
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT
EXHIBIT "A"
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
First Midwest Equipment Finance Co.,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
No. 17-cv-02121
Honorable Gaty Feinetman
)
)
Lenn Morris and Ricky Freeman,
Defendants.
)
)
)
AFFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE
I, the undersigned attorney, based solely on the attached Status Repott provided by the United
States Department of Defense's Manpower Data Center (the "Center"), state that Lenn Morris and
Ricky Freeman are not currently in active duty of any branch of the United States Armed Services. True
and correct copies of the Center's Status Repotts for Lenn Morris and Ricky Freeman are attached
hereto.
Dated:June 19, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
FIRST MIDWEST EQUIPMENT
FINANCE CO.
By:
Isl Alexander N. Wright
Alexander N. Wright
ASHEN IFAULKNER
217 N. Jefferson St., Suite 601
Chicago, Illinois 60661
312.655.0800
Atty. No.: 6314304
awright@ashenlaw.com
Results as of· Jun-19-2017 02:27:29 PM
Department of Defense Manpower Data Center
SCRA 3.0
Status Report
Pursuant to Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
SSN: XXX-XX-3479
Birth Date:
Last Name: FREEMAN
First Name: RICKY
Middle Name:
Active Duty Status As Of: Jun-19-2017
Active Dul
AcHve Du\ Start Date
Seivlce Corn
NA
Active Ou
nent
NA
Service Com anent
Start Date
S'<'\)A
NA
L
This response reHec1s wh~r~-~Jl~dividui3! left acl1've' duty
NA
sl'~hJ; wi\~ln'367''days
Da1e
Order Nolificatlon Start Date
Service Com anent
NA
NA
Upon searching the data banks of the Department of Defense Manpower Data Center, based on the information that you provided, the above is the status of
the individual
on the active duty status date as to all branches of the Uniformed Services (Army, Navy, Marine Corps,
Air Force, NOAA, Public Health, and
Coast Guard). This status includes information on a Servicemember or his/her unit receiving notification of future orders to report for Active Duty.
Department of Defense - Manpower Data Center
4800 Marl< Center Drive, Suite 04E25
Arlington, VA 22350
The Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) is an organization of the Department of Defense (DoD) that maintains the Defense Enrollment and Eligibility
Reporting System (DEERS) database which is the official source of data on eligibility for military medical care and other eligibility systems.
The DoD strongly supports the enforcement of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 USC App.§ 3901 et seq, as amended) (SCRA) (formerly known as
the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940). DMDC has issued hundreds of thousands of "does not possess any information indicating that the
individual is currently on active duly" responses, and has experienced only a small error rate. In the event the individual referenced above, or any family
member, friend, or representative asserts in any manner that the individual was on active duty for the active duty status date, or is otherwise entitled to the
protections of the SCRA, you are strongly encouraged to obtain further verification of the person's status by contacting that person's Service. Service contact
information can be found on the SCRA website's FAQ page (033) via this URL: https://scra.dmdc.osd.mil/faq.xhtml#Q33. If you have evidence the person
was on active duty for the active duty status date and you fail to obtain this additional Service verification, punitive provisions of the SCRA may be invoked
against you. See 50
use App.§ 3921(c).
This response reflects the following information: (1) The individual's Active Duty status on the Active Duty Status Date (2) Whether the individual left Active
Duty status within 367 days preceding the Active Duty Status Date (3) Whether the individual or his/her unit received early notification to report for active
duty on the Active Duty Status Date.
More information on "Active Duty Status"
Active duty status as reported in this certificate is defined in accordance with 10 USC§ 101 (d) (1 ). Prior to 2010 only some of the active duty periods less
than 30 consecutive days in length were available. ln the case of a member of the National Guard, this includes service under a call to active service
authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense under 32 USC§ 502(f) for purposes of responding to a national emergency declared by the
President and supported by Federal funds. All Active Guard Reserve {AGR) members must be assigned against an authorized mobilization position in the
unit they support. This includes Navy Training and Administration of the Reserves {TARs), Marine Corps Active Reserve (ARs) and Coast Guard Reserve
Program Administrator (RPAs). Active Duty status also applies to a Uniformed Service member who is an active duty commissioned officer of the U.S.
Public Health Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Commissioned Corps).
Coverage Under the SCRA is Broader in Some Cases
Coverage under the SCRA is broader in some cases and includes some categories of persons on active duty for purposes of the SCRA who would not be
reported as on Active Duty under this certificate. SCRA protections are for Title 10 and Title 14 active duty records for all the Uniformed Services periods.
Title 32 periods of Active Duty are not covered by SCRA, as defined in accordance with 10 USC§ 101 (d)(1 ).
Many times orders are amended to extend the period of active duty, which would extend SCRA protections. Persons seeking to re!y on this website
certification should check to make sure the orders on which SCRA protections are based have not been amended to extend the inclusive dates of service.
Furthermore, some protections of the SCRA may extend to persons who have received orders to report for active duty or to be inducted, but who have not
actually begun active duty or actually reported for induction. The Last Date on Active Duty entry is important because a number of protections of the SCRA
extend beyond the last dates of active duty.
Those who could rely on this certificate are urged to seek qualified legal counsel to ensure that all rights guaranteed to Service members under the SCRA
are protected
WARNING: This certificate was provided based on a last name, SSN/date of birth, and active duty status date provided by the requester. Providing
erroneous information will cause an erroneous certificate to be provided.
Certificate ID: 18RCHF6FE5BDEFO
Results as of: Jun-19-2017 02:26:39 PM
Department of Defense Manpower Data Center
SCRA3.0
Status Report
Purswmt to Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
SSN: XXX-XX-8811
Birth Date:
Last Name: MORRIS
First Name: LENN
Middle Name:
Active Duty Status As Of: Jun-19-2017
Active Du
Status
Active Out End Date
Start Date
Service Com onent
NA
NA
Active Out Start Date
Servica Com
NA
nent
NA
u\y Status Date
M
M
This res
nse refiects whether the lndividua'i
M
or,h\~-,9;,uJ1,-h;s ~~f.lJ\i{id~x 5313.65, Birmingt
04/30/2016
i±:
Invoice
34090
05/01/2015
Forest Energies Ll.C
$5,484.88
$0.00 70020-001
Invoiced
PO Box 531355, Sirming~
03/25/2016
rf
Invoice
29422
04/01/2016
forest Energies LLC
$5,484.88
$0.00 70020-001
Invoiced
PO Box 531365, Birmingt
03/01/2016
(£
Invoice
11745
03/01/2016
Forest Energies LLC
$5,484.88
$0.00 70020-001
Invoiced
PO Box 531355; Birmingt
01/01/2016
8::
Invoice
11744
02/0l/2016
forest Energies LLC
$5,484.88
$0.00 70020-001
Invoiced
PO Box: 531365, BirmingJ
01/01/2016
:£
Invoice
10471
01/01/2016
Forest Energies LLC
$5,484.88
$0.00 70020-001
Invoiced
PO Box 531355, Birming~
12/01/2015
First Midwest Equipment Finance Co. v. Lenn Morris and Ricky Freeman
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT
EXHIBIT "C"
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
First Midwest Equipment Finance Co.,
)
v.
Lenn Morris and Ricky Freeman,
Defendants.
No. 17-cv-02121
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Honorable Gary Feinerman
)
)
)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF ALEXANDER WRIGHT
The undersigned being first duly sworn on oath states the following:
1.
I am one of the attorneys of record for First Midwest Equipment Finance Co., Plaintiff
in this matter and I have been licensed to practice law in the state of Illinois since 2013. I have
knowledge and experience handling like matters.
2.
Attached is a 1-page fee sheet detailing the services performed in conjunction with the
above-captioned matter. The detailed sheet was produced from my firm's billing system called TABS.
TABS is reliable, accurate and widely used in the legal community to keep and maintain billing records.
3.
The attached statement indicates the costs and se1vices performed and the amount of
time spent in handling this matter. Additional time will be spent in traveling to and from Court and
presenting this case to Court for Judgment. The hourly rate charged by our firm is $275.00 which is
within the range of fees customarily charged by firms in this area handling Wee matters. The attached
sheet shows that a total of 11.15 hours of work were performed on this matter, for a total of $3,066.25
in fees. Additionally, costs of $2,422.27 were generated. Plaintiff seeks Court approval for an award of
attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $5,488.52.
4.
Under penalties provided by law pursuant to Section 1-109 of the Illinois Code of
Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are Uue
and correct.
Respectfully submitted,
Ashen IFaulkner
217 N. Jefferson St., Suite 601
Chicago, Illinois 60661
312.655.0800
awright@ashenlaw.com
Atty No.: 6314304
IS/Alexander Wright
Alexander N. Wright
Attorney for First Midwest
Equipment Finance Co.
Date: 06/2112017
Detail Transaction File List
Law Offices of Deborah S. Ashen, Ltd.
Trans
Date
Client
H Tcode/
Tmkr P Task Code
Rate
Hours
to Bill
275.00
0.75
Page: 1
Amount
Ref#
Client ID 323.0009 First Midwest Bancorp.
323.0009
11/30/2016
5 A
206.25 Review new file. Pull BK information and review status
323.0009
323.0009
12/02/2016
12/06/2016
5 A
1 A
275.00
275.00
0.75
0.50
206.25
137.50
323.0009
12/13/2016
1 A
275.00
0.25
68.75
323.0009
12/21/2016
1 A
275.00
0.25
68.75
323.0009
01/05/2017
1 A
275.00
0.50
137.50
323.0009
01/15/2017
5 A
275.00
0.25
68.75
323.0009
01/18/2017
A
275.00
0.25
68.75
323.0009
323.0009
01/19/2017
02/14/2017
1 A
5 A
70
1
1.150
275.00
0.25
1.15
68.75
323.0009
02/21/2017
A
70
323.0009
02/22/2017
5 A
275.00
0.75
206.25
323.0009
323.0009
03/12/2017
03/17/2017
5 A
5 A
275.00
275.00
0.75
1.00
206.25
275.00
323.0009
03/17/2017
1 A
275.00
0.25
68.75
323.0009
03/17/2017
A
323.0009
03/20/2017
A
323.0009
323.0009
323.0009
323.0009
03/20/2017
03/20/2017
03/20/2017
04/18/2017
A
A
A
A
323.0009
04/19/2017
5 A
323.0009
323.0009
323.0009
04/21/2017
04/21/2017
05/04/2017
1 A
1 A
5 A
70
70
1
323.0009
323.0009
05/19/2017
06/14/2017
1 A
5 p
70
1
323.0009
06/19/2017
323.0009
06/21/2017
1,381.00
70
400.00
275.00
70
70
70
70
0.25
1.40
110.00
0.46
522.50
55.000
0.460
275.00
68.75
1.00
275.00
0.250
0.670
275.00
1.25
3.50
1.34
343.75
0.460
275.00
0.25
0.92
68.75
5 p
275.00
1.10
302.50
5 p
275.00
0.80
220.00
of BK. Follow up with client for additional direction.
Prepare and file Proof of Claim and Request for Notice.
Exchange correspondence w/client in re returned
payments. Review BK docket to confirm DIP Order was
entered. Telephone conference with Debtor atty in re
APP payments. Follow up correspondence to client
advising of status.
F/u correspondence w/client in re payments. No post
petition payments received. Correspondence to Debtor
atty in re the same.
Per client still no APP payments. Exchange
correspondence w/local counsel in AL. Forward
documents to AL counsel to move forward w/Motion to
Modify.
Exchange correspondence w/local counsel and client in
re moving forward w/Motion to modify. Request
additional docs from client in order to proceed.
Review additional BK documents as received from BK
Court. Flu correspondence w/local counsel in re status
of Motion to Modify
Receipt and review affidavit in support of Motion to
Modify from CC. Forward to client to execute.
postage
Attempt to contact Debtor's BK counsel, C Taylor
Corckett in Re turnover of collateral, pursuant order for
relief from stay. Leave vim and follow up w./e-mail.
Local Counsel Fees (flat fee $1200) and Costs ($181.00for motion relief for stay
Issued demands to PGs per Bank's request. Will pursue
PGs if no response to demands.
Draft Complaint against PGs.
Finalize and file Complaint against PGs. Review file for
best place for seivice.
Exchange correspondence w/client in re recovery of
equip. Equip location still not located. Exchange
correspondence wllocal counsel to attend meeting of
Creditors on 3/20/17 to compel Debtor to disclose
location of the equipment.
Filing fee for suit against Lenn Morris and Ricky
Freeman
Memo to client in re location of the equipment and
contact information to arrange recovery of the same
discovered at the Creditors Meeting of Debtor.
ECF
Process Service
postage
Court appearance fee for local counsel, 341 meeting to
determine location of equipment.
Defendants are in default. Prepare Motion for Order of
Default.
copies
postage
Appeared in federal court for Motion for Entry of Default.
Motion granted and status dates were stricken.
postage- Phillips Firm Invoice #8 and #1028
Confirm that Bank was able to recover collateral..
Request updated information for prove~up.
Pull Military records from database for Rule 55 Motion.
Draft Bank affidavit, awaiting payoff info from client.
Draft Rule 55 Motion. Draft NOM. Review docket, no
appearances filed.
Complete and file Rule 55(b) Motion. Draft NOM.
Motion to be sent via FedEx per Court Order.
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
ARCH
17
18
19
Total for.Client ID 323.0009
AW
--·--··----
---··--·---
· · · - - · - - - · · - - - - - - · - - - · - - - Wednesday 06/21/2017 9:33
am
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?