Openmind Solutions, Inc. v. Does 1-2925

Filing 11

MOTION for Leave to File The Electronic Frontier Foundation's Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae by Electronic Frontier Foundation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amicus Brief, # 2 Exhibit ISP Notice, # 3 Exhibit Schoen Declaration)(Mudd, Charles)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 2 READ AT ONCE COURT-DIRECTED NOTICE REGARDING ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA SEEKING DISCLOSURE OF YOUR IDENTITY A legal document called a subpoena has been sent to your Internet Service Provider, ______________________, requiring the disclosure of your name, address and other information to a company that has sued you.1 The company that sued you, called the “Plaintiff,” claims that various people have infringed its copyrights by illegally downloading and/or distributing its copyrighted works. However, the Plaintiff does not know the actual names or addresses of these people – only the Internet Protocol address (“IP address”) of the computer associated with the alleged activity. That is why the Plaintiff’s legal filing simply identifies the Defendants as “Does.” In order to determine the identities of the people associated with the IP addresses it has collected, Plaintiff now has issued subpoenas to various Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) and asked them to provide identifying information associated with those IP addresses. If you are receiving this notice, that means the Plaintiff has asked your ISP to disclose your identifying information to Plaintiff, including your name, current (and permanent) addresses, and your email address and Media Access Control number. Enclosed is a copy of the subpoena seeking your information and the exhibit page containing the IP address that has been associated with your computer and showing the date and time you are alleged to have used the Internet to download or upload the movie. This is a civil lawsuit, not a criminal case. You have not been charged with any crime. The Plaintiff wants the court to order you to pay it thousands of dollars for uploading or downloading its movie without permission. If the Plaintiff receives your information from your ISP, you may be added as a named defendant to the lawsuit. Plaintiff has filed this case as a “class action,” which means that it claims, among other things, that common questions of law and fact apply to the Defendants in this case. That Court has not yet determined whether it is fair and appropriate to treat the Defendants as a class in this case. More information about class actions can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_action INFORMATION ABOUT YOU HAS NOT YET BEEN DISCLOSED, BUT IT WILL BE DISCLOSED IN 30 DAYS IF YOU DO NOT TAKE ACTION 1 The lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The case is entitled Openmind Solutions v. Does 1-2925, Case No. 3:11-cv00092. 1 Your identifying information has not yet been disclosed to the Plaintiff. This notice is intended to inform you of some of your rights and options. It does not provide legal advice. We cannot advise you about what grounds exist, if any, to challenge this subpoena. If you would like legal advice you should consult an attorney who can discuss your particular situation. On the following pages of this notice you will find a list of resources that may help you locate an attorney and decide how to respond to the subpoena or lawsuit If you want to prevent being identified, you have 30 days from the date of this notice to ask the court to block the subpoena or to dismiss the case against you. You can do this by filing a legal document called a “motion,” but you should take care not to reveal your identity in the motion. You must also notify your ISP that you have asked the court to block your identity from being released. If you need more than 30 days to file such a motion or find a lawyer to assist you, you can file a motion asking for an extension of time; you should also notify your ISP if you file a motion asking for more time. Your ISP cannot file these documents for you. You must file them directly with the Court in the Southern District of Illinois. If you file a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion to dismiss, your identity will not be disclosed until the court makes a decision on your motion. If you do nothing, then after 30 days your ISP will send the Plaintiff your name, address, email address, telephone number, and your modem’s Media Access Control number. You may wish to obtain an attorney to advise you on these issues or to help you take action. Three resources to help you find a lawyer are: • The American Bar Association’s attorney locator can be found on the Internet at http://www.abanet.org/lawyerlocator/searchlawyer.html • The State Bar of Illinois has a Lawyer Referral Service that can be reached at http://www.illinoislawyerfinder.com/ • The Electronic Frontier Foundation has created a website that lists attorneys who have volunteered to consult with people in your situation and contains further information about the lawsuit that has been filed against you as well as similar lawsuits: o https://www.eff.org/issues/file-sharing/subpoena-defense To assist you or your lawyer in evaluating your rights and options, enclosed is a copy of the subpoena seeking your information, the exhibit page containing the IP address that has been associated with your computer, and Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2 The Plaintiff has created a website where it has posted copies of the Complaint filed in the case; the Motion for Early Discovery, which it filed to explain why it needs this information; Motions to Quash and/or to Dismiss that have been filed by other Defendants, as well as Plaintiff’s responses to those motions; and answers to Frequently Asked Questions: www.___________.com If you file a motion and the Plaintiff opposes it, you will be able to find a copy of the Plaintiff’s response there. OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE LAWSUIT AGAINST YOU The subpoena was issued as a result of a court order issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, in a case entitled Openmind Solutions v. Does 1-2925, Case No. 3:11-cv-00092. To maintain a lawsuit against you in the District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, the court must have personal jurisdiction over you. If you do not live in the Southern District of Illinois or otherwise have contacts with the District, you may be able to challenge the Court’s personal jurisdiction over you and have the case dismissed against you in the Southern District of Illinois. However, please note that even if your challenge is successful, the Plaintiff can still file against you in another location, such as in a state in which a court has personal jurisdiction over you. You may also be able to challenge the subpoena on a number of other grounds, including that it was improper to add you into the lawsuit with others (called “joinder”), or that the First Amendment requirements for revealing your name and address have not been met. A “friend of the court” brief on those issues was filed in another court by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and is available here: https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/uscg/effamicus11411.pdf You may also be able to challenge the subpoena or the lawsuit on other grounds depending on your particular situation. This should be discussed with an attorney. If you are interested in discussing this matter with the Plaintiff’s attorneys, you may contact them by telephone at _____________. Please understand that these lawyers represent the company that sued you. They can speak with you about settling the lawsuit, if you wish to consider that. You should be aware that they are not your attorneys and are adverse to you. You should also be aware that if you contact them they may learn your identity, and that anything you say to them can later be used against you in court. You should not call the Court. Again, you may wish to retain an attorney to discuss these issues and your options. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?