Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC v. Forest River Inc

Filing 87

MOTION to Stay re 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment and for Scheduling Conference by Defendant Forest River Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A Email from D. Irmcher, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B Forest River Interrog. Ans., # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C Example B&T Patent, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D Heartland Email, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E Exerpt of '841 Patent, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F Babcock Declaration)(Fountain, Ryan)

KaU. Zellma
From: Sent: Subject: Greg Cooper
Monday, March 14. 200510:05 AM

To:

Grunden, Zellma Fwd: Re: Heartland Turning Radius Patent

»> »>

"Scott Tut:tle" <[e-mail]::. 3/2/2005
»>

11:12:05 AM

Greg. I was wondering if you could help me out with some of the questions my senior partner (Braidn Brady) has regarding our patent application. Heartland The real part of thLLCav. plicatiRivertInct we are concerned about and feel we have a good Recreational Vehicles is pp Forest on ha shot at is the improved turning radius design where we cut back the frame and also remolded the cap design to take advantage of that void in the frame. r have included Brian's repsonse to me with some One is. he ia looking for some sort of questions he has. assurance that is this concept is even defensible? And if we were to have to go to court over it. how much would we be looking at to defend it? Call me when you can. Thanks. Scott TUttle -- - --- -- - - Original Message --- - -- ---- ----- - ---.-------- -- ----From: [e-mail] Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09;35;46 EST Scott: The issue is whether or not the patent is defensible. We need some assurances from our attorney(s) that this will be the case. For example, does Cambridge infringe the patent as being applied for? Cost to defend patent? Need more info. BB [This E-mail scanned for viruses
by Data Constructs

Doc. 87 Att. 4

Company]

[This E-mail

scanned for viruses

by Data Constructs

Company]

B&T 069

Dockets.Justia.com

KaU. Zellma
From: Sent: Subject: Greg Cooper
Monday, March 14. 200510:05 AM

To:

Grunden, Zellma Fwd: Re: Heartland Turning Radius Patent

»>
»>

"Scott Tut:tletl <[e-mail]>
»>

3/2/2005

11:12:05 AM

Greg. I was wondering if you could help me out with Borne of the questions my senior partner (Braidn Brady) has regarding our patent application. The real part of this appplication that we are concerned about and feel we have a good shot at is the improved turning radius design where we cut back the frame and also remolded the cap design to take advantage of that void in the frame. r have included Brian's repsonse to me with some One is. he ia looking for some sort of questions he has. assurance that is this concept is even defensible? And if we were to have to go to court over it. how much would we be looking at to defend it? Call me when you can. Thanks. Scott TUttle -- - --- -- - - Original Message - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - ---. - - - -- -- -- - - -- From: [e-mail] Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:35:46 EST Scott: The issue is whether or not the patent is defensible. We need some assurances from our attorney(s) that this will be the case. For example, does Cambridge infringe the patent as being applied for? Coat to defend patent? Need more info.
BB

[Thia E-mail

scanned for viruses by Data Constructs Company]

[This E-mail

scanned for viruses by Data Constructs company]

B&T 069