STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al
MOTION to Amend/Correct 117 Case Management Plan Tendered by, filed by Plaintiff STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., Counter Defendants STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Dorelli, Michael)
STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) ) OOGLES N GOOGLES FRANCHISING, LLC, ) et. al. ) ) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs and . ) Third Party Plaintiff ) ) **************************************** ) ) OOGLES N GOOGLES FRANCHISING, LLC, ) ) v. ) ) STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., ) ) Counter-Defendant, and ) ) STEVEN A. ESRIG, ) ) Third Party Defendant. ) STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC.,
Case No. 1:05-cv-0354-DFH-TAB
MOTION TO AMEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Stelor Productions, LLC, by counsel, hereby moves for an order amending the case management schedule. In support of its motion, the Plaintiff/CounterDefendant states the following: 1. On March 5, 2008, this Court granted Defendants' motion for leave to file a
counterclaim and on March 7, 2008, the Defendants filed their counterclaim. 2. On March 11, 2008, this Court granted Plaintiff's motion to have Robert Merz
admitted pro hac vice. On March 20, 2008, this Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to file
second amended complaint to add additional parties, which names fifty-three (53) new Defendants in this litigation. THE RECENT ADDITION OF THREE PRINCIPAL PARTIES 3. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant subsequently discovered three additional entities
operating under the name "Oogles N Googles." 4. On August 15, 2008, both Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant and Defendants/Counter-
Plaintiffs moved the Court to amend their respective complaints. 5. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant added the three previously undiscovered entities,
Oogles N Googles Branding, LLC, Mendell Enterprises, LLC and Bernier, LLC. All of these entities operate under the actual or assumed name "Oogles N Googles." Two of these companies are owned by the Defendants, Danya and Kevin Mendell, principals of Defendant, Oogles N Googles Franchising, LLC. 6. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reasonably requires additional time to conduct
additional discovery in order to investigate these entities and determine what connection these new entities have to the previously named Defendants. 7. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs added Steven A. Esrig, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Stelor Productions, LLC. 8. With the addition of Steven A. Esrig, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant will need
additional time to adequately analyze the validity of the Defendants' amended counterclaim. Such an analysis will require additional discovery and an additional expert or experts to address the issues raised in the counterclaim.
ABUSIVE AND UNDULY BURDENSOME DISCOVERY 9. The Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs have engaged in an abusive and overly
burdensome discovery process that has thoroughly overloaded counsel for Plaintiff/CounterDefendant. 10. The Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' abusive process is outlined in
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's motion for protective order. Said motion has been drafted but pursuant to Seventh Circuit case law and practice and with the hope of making the November 4, 2008 discovery hearing manageable, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant is preparing an exhibit outlining and organizing the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's objections. Said motion will be on file with the Court on or before October 22, 2008. 11. The abusive and overly burdensome discovery practice of the
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs has greatly prejudiced Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Stelor Productions. 12. As a result, Robert Merz, counsel for the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, will be
withdrawing his appearance in this matter. Mr. Merz will be replaced by new outside counsel. Hoover Hull LLP will remain as local counsel. NECESSITY FOR ADDITIONAL AND EXPANDED DISCOVERY 13. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant is presently restricted to twenty five (25)
interrogatories and twenty-five (25) production requests to each Defendant. At present, the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has exhausted the discovery permitted by the Court as to the principal Defendants in this case, Kevin and Danya Mendell, Oogles N Googles Franchising, LLC, and needs to engage newly added principal Defendants Oogles N Googles Branding, LLC and Mendell Enterprises, LLC. 3
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant needs additional interrogatories and production
requests as to the principal Defendants in this case, Kevin and Danya Mendell, Oogles N Googles Franchising, LLC, Oogles N Googles Branding, LLC and Mendell Enterprises, LLC. Since Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant served its initial interrogatories and production requests the Plaintiff has significantly expanded their business adding franchisees, partnerships and product offerings. HEARING ON THIS MOTION 15. This motion is directly related to the discovery hearing scheduled for November
4, 2008 as well Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's motion for protective order which will be on file by October 22, 2008. 16. The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant requests that this motion be heard on November
4, 2008, contemporaneous with the discovery hearing set for the same date. CONCLUSION 17. Both Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Stelor Productions, LLC, and Third Party
Defendant, Steven Esrig, will be greatly prejudiced if the present case management plan is not amended and extended in its entirety. 18. Attached hereto is a proposed amended case management plan, which extends the
deadlines in the current Case Management Plan by seven (7) months and requests a presumptive trial date in October 2009. In addition, the attached proposed Amended Case Management Plan allows for the additional discovery necessary to fully investigate the principal Defendants. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Stelor Productions, LLC, by counsel, respectfully requests that this Court hear this motion during the hearing currently scheduled for November 4, 2008, and at that time enter an order amending the case management schedule per 4
the amended case management plan attached hereto as Exhibit 1, in addition to granting all other relief just and proper.
Respectfully submitted, s/Michael A. Dorelli John David Hoover, Attorney No. 7945-49 Michael A. Dorelli, Attorney No. 20862-49 HOOVER HULL LLP 111 Monument Circle, Ste. 4400 P.O. Box 44989 Indianapolis, IN 46244-0989 Phone: (317) 822-4400 Fax: (317) 822-0234 E-mail: email@example.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Of counsel: Robert Merz Stelor Productions, LLC 19110 Montgomery Village Avenue, #320, Montgomery Village, MD 20886 Tel: (301) 963-0000 Fax: (301) 740-7552 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 21, 2008, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically, and that notice of this filing will be sent to the following party by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. Stephen L. Vaughan
s/ Michael A. Dorelli
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?