Filing 276

MOTION for Protective Order, filed by Plaintiff STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., Counter Defendant STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dorelli, Michael)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. OOGLES N GOOGLES FRANCHISING, LLC, et. al. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs and . Third Party Plaintiff **************************************** OOGLES N GOOGLES FRANCHISING, LLC, v. STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, Counter-Defendant, and STEVEN A. ESRIG, Third Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:05-cv-0354-DFH-TAB ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER This matter having come before the Court on the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion for Protective Order, and the Court having been duly advised in the premises, finds the Motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' discovery shall be limited to non-privileged matters directly relating to the registration and use of the Trademarks in question as outlined in the parties' pleadings; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant is not required to respond to the discovery requests identified in Exhibit A to its Motion for Protective Order. Dated: ____________________ _________________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division Distribution to: John David Hoover Michael A. Dorelli HOOVER HULL LLP Stephen L. Vaughan Robert F. Merz Stelor Productions, LLC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?