STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al

Filing 52

Joint MOTION to Modify Order on Final Pretrial Schedule and Trial Setting and CMP Order, filed by STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC.(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Zack, David) Modified on 12/2/2005 (LSC, ).

Download PDF
STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al Doc. 52 Att. 1 Case 1:05-cv-00354-DFH-TAB Document 52-2 Filed 12/01/2005 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. OOGLES N GOOGLES, an Indiana corporation; KEVIN MENDELL, an individual; DANYA MENDELL, an individual; and X, Y, Z CORPORATIONS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:05-cv-0354-DFH-TAB AGREED ORDER MODIFYING ORDER ON PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN ORDER This matter having come before the Court on parties Joint Motion to Modify Order on Pretrial Schedule and Case Management Plan Order ("the Motion"), and the Court having been duly advised on the premises, said Motion is hereby GRANTED and the Pretrial Schedule and Case Management Order are modified as follows: March 17, 2006 Plaintiff shall disclose the name, address, and vita of all expert witnesses, and shall serve the report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). However, if Plaintiff uses expert witness testimony at the summary judgment stage, such disclosures must be made no later than 60 days prior to the summary judgment deadline. April 17, 2006 -- Defendants shall disclose the name, address, and vita of all expert witnesses, and shall serve the report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) within 30 days after Plaintiff(s) serves its expert witness disclosure; or if none, Defendant(s) shall make its expert disclosure on or before. However, if Defendants use expert witness testimony at the summary judgment stage, such disclosures must be made no later than 30 days prior to the summary judgment deadline. June 19, 2006 All discovery completed. June 19, 2006 -- Any party who wishes to limit or preclude expert testimony at trial shall file any such objections no later than. Any party who wishes to preclude expert Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-00354-DFH-TAB Document 52-2 Filed 12/01/2005 Page 2 of 3 witness testimony at the summary judgment stage shall file any such objections with their responsive brief within the briefing schedule established by Local Rule 56.1. July 17, 2006 Dispositive motions to be filed, if any. August 17, 2006 -- All parties shall file and serve their final witness and exhibit lists. October 2006 final pretrial conference. November 2006 trial to be scheduled. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at Indianapolis, Indiana, this ____ day of __________, 2005. _________________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division Case 1:05-cv-00354-DFH-TAB Document 52-2 Filed 12/01/2005 Page 3 of 3 Distribution to: John David Hoover, Esq. HOOVER HULL BAKER & HEATH LLP jdhoover@hooverhull.com Kevin C. Kaplan, Esq. David J. Zack, Esq. Burlington, Weil, Schwiep, Kaplan & Blonsky, P.A. kkaplan@bwskb.com dzack@bwskb.com Bryan S. Redding, Esq. COHEN, GARELICK & GLAZIER Breeding@cgglawfirm.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?