STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al

Filing 83

MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint to Add Additional Parties, filed by Plaintiff STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hoover, John)

Download PDF
STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al Doc. 83 Att. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. Plaintiff, vs. OOGLES N GOOGLES, an Indiana corporation; KEVIN MENDELL; DANYA MENDELL; MICHELLE COTE; ROB LENDERMAN; STACEY LENDERMAN; BRENDA MURTY; MARGIE THOMAS; ROB SLYTER; ELIZABETH SLYTER; CORINNA SPARKS; CHRISTINE WATERBURRY; LEIGH SUNDLING; and TINA CARTAYA, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:05-cv-0354-DFH-TAB ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND MOTION AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD ADDITIONAL PARTIES This matter having come before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint to Add Additional Parties, and the Court having been duly advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS said Motion; IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to file its Second Amended Complaint for Damages in the form attached to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave as Exhibit 1 (the "Second Amended Complaint"). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed as of the date of this Order and shall relate back to the date on which Plaintiff filed its original Complaint. Dated: ____________________ _________________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division Dockets.Justia.com Distribution to: John David Hoover HOOVER HULL LLP jdhoover@hooverhull.com Kevin C. Kaplan David J. Zack Burlington, Weil, Schwiep, Kaplan & Blonsky, P.A. kkaplan@bwskb.com Stephen L. Vaughan Steve@IPLawIndiana.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?