ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.

Filing 17

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/25/10 for Defendant to Answer of Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff ONE NUMBER CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barron, Jeff)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ONE NUMBER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 1:10-CV-0312RLY-TAB ) ) ) ) )

JOINT MOTION FOR A TWENTY -TWO DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendant, Google, Inc. ("Google"), by and through its attorneys, and Plaintiff, One Number Corporation ("One Number") , by and through its attorneys, jointly move to extend the date for Google to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by twenty-two (22) days, to and including June 25, 2010. 1. Google's Answer or other response to One Number's Complaint is currently due

on Thursday, June 3, 2010, which time has not yet expired . See Dkt. 15, Google's Unopposed Motion For A Thirty-Day Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. 2. The parties met on May 25, 2010 and discussed One Number's claims against

Google and Google's defenses and responses to those claims. T he discussion was productive. 3. The parties require additional time to consider their respective positions and

determine whether this case can be resolved at an early stage. In addition, one of the named inventors of the One Number patents-in-suit is leaving on a lengthy vacation and will not be available for several weeks. This person is needed for One Number's assessment.

4.

The parties seek a modest amount of additional time to continue their discussions.

The part ies respectfully request that the date for Google to answer or otherwise respond to One Number's Complaint be extended by an additional twenty-two (22) days, to and including Friday, June 25, 2010. 5. This is the second motion for an extension of time subsequent to Google's Notice

of Initial Extension of Time (Dkt. 13). This motion is not made for purposes of delay. 6. 7. This is a joint motion by both parties. A proposed order is enclosed.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant Google an additional twenty-two days (22), to an including June 25, 2010, for Google to answer to otherwise respond to One Number's Complaint.

May 28, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alastair J. Warr (by permission) Alastair J. Warr Dean E. McConnell Scott S. Morrisson Birk K. Billingsley KRIEG DeVAULT LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 2800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 [phone] [phone] (Facsimile) [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff One Number Corporation

/s/ Jeff M. Barron Todd G. Vare Jeff M. Barron Jennifer Schuster BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 11 South Meridian Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 [phone] [phone] (Facsimile) [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system on May 28, 2010. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. Alastair J. Warr Dean E. McConnell Scott S. Morrisson Birk K. Billingsley KRIEG DeVAULT LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 2800 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2079 /s/ Jeff M. Barron