ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.

Filing 28

MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Inter Parties Reexamination, filed by Defendant GOOGLE INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Barron, Jeff)

Download PDF
ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC. D Doc. 28 Att. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ONE NUMBER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-0312-RLY-TAB ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT This case, having come before the Court upon the Motion of Defendant Google, Inc. to stay the proceedings in this case pending inter partes reexamination of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,680,256 and 7,440,565, and this Court having considered the motion and all other relevant factors, finds that Google's motion is should be GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that this action is STAYED until after the conclusion of the inter partes reexamination of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,680,256 and 7,440,565. SO ORDERED this ____ day of _________, 2010. JUDGE, United States District Court Southern District of Indiana ockets.Justia.com Distribution to: Alastair J. Warr (Counsel for Plaintiff) Dean E. McConnell (Counsel for Plaintiff) Scott S. Morrisson (Counsel for Plaintiff) Birk K. Billingsley (Counsel for Plaintiff) Todd G. Vare (Counsel for Defendant) Jeff M. Barron (Counsel for Defendant) Jennifer L. Schuster (Counsel for Defendant) INDS02 1137490v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?