SMITH v. WARDEN
Filing
4
ENTRY DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The Clerk shall include a form complaint with Smith's copy of this Entry. Smith shall have through August 22, 2017, to file a complaint and if he files a complaint, he must also pay the $400. 00 filing fee or demonstrate his inability to do so. The motion regarding letter, dkt. 3 , is granted to the extent that the Clerk shall include a copy of the docket with Smith's copy of this Entry. The docket reflects all activity in this case (SEE ENTRY). Copy of Entry, form complaint and docket sheet sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/28/2017. (Attachments: # 1 form complaint, # 2 copy of docket sheet) (DW)
CM/ECF LIVE
Page 1 of 1
*** PUBLIC DOCKET ***
PROSE
U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Terre Haute)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:17-cv-00320-LJM-MJD
SMITH v. WARDEN
Assigned to: Judge Larry J. McKinney
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Date Filed: 07/07/2017
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 555 Prisoner Petitions Prison Condition
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH
represented by RICHARD ALLEN SMITH
59747-065
TERRE HAUTE - USP
TERRE HAUTE U.S.
PENITENTIARY
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. BOX 33
TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
WARDEN
Date Filed
represented by WARDEN
.
PRO SE
#
Docket Text
07/07/2017
1
COMPLAINT against WARDEN, filed by RICHARD ALLEN SMITH. (No
fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit FCC Tuscon Letter, # 2
Envelope)(HET) Modified on 7/28/2017 (GSO). (Entered: 07/10/2017)
07/11/2017
2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction
issued. (HET) (Entered: 07/11/2017)
07/26/2017
3
MOTION regarding Letter, filed by Plaintiff RICHARD ALLEN SMITH.
(Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(DW) (Entered: 07/27/2017)
Case #: 2:17-cv-00320-LJM-MJD
https://ecf.insd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt-insd.pl?665725005766878-L_1_0-1
7/28/2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?