Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 297

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of 296 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Evidence of the 301 Family Patents Under the Doctrine of Equivalents by Defendants/Counter Claimants Vonage America, Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G)(Campbell, Terrence)

Download PDF
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al Doc. 297 Att. 1 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT A Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 2 of 10 UNITED STATE DEPARTMENT Patent and Address OF COMMERCE Trademark D.C. Office COMMISSIONER Washington. OF PATENTS 20231 AND TRADEMARKS SERIAL NUMBER FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATIORNEY DOCKET NO. 08/238605 05/05/94 CHRISTIE SPT1O57 BLUM. 26M1/0707 HARLEY R. BALL SPRINT LAW DEPARTMENT PARKWAY 8140 WARD MOKCMPO5O6 MAILSTOP CITY MO 64114 KANSAS This Is EXAMINER ARTUNIT PAPER NUMBER 2603 DATE charge of MAILED 07/07/95 communication from the examiner In your application. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS El This applicatIon has been examined esponslve to this action wiil is to communIcation filed on -5//.c9 days 133 35 U.S.C. hIs from the action is made finai. shortened Failure to statutory period the for response for set the to expire __________ to months abandoned. date of this letter. respond within period response cause application become Part THE FOLLOWING AUACHMENTS Cited ARE PART OF THIS ACTION 1. otice of References Cited by Examiner PTO-1449. PTO-892. 2. ii El El Notice of Draftsmans Informal Patent Drawing Review P10-152. P10-948. 3. 5. Notice of Art by Applicant to Effect 4. Notice of Patent Application El Information on How Drawing Changes P10-1474.. 6. Part II SUMMARY OF ACTION 1.Ims _________________________________________________ t//2Q above claims are pending In the application. Of the _____________________________________________________________ are withdrawn from consideration. lalms il Claims have been cancelled. are allowed. 4.Clalms Il El Claims c/.._/ _O are rejected. are objected to. 6. Claims______________________________________________________________ are subject to restriction or eiection requirement. 7..applicatIon El ll has been filed with informal drawings under 37 C.F.R. 1.85 which are acceptable for examination purposes. 8. Formal drawings are required in response to this Office action. The are corrected or substitute not drawings acceptable have been received or on __________________________. Notice of Under Drawing Review 37 C.F.R. 1.84 these drawings acceptable see explanation Draftsmans Patent PTO-948. 10. ii The proposed additional or substitute sheets of drawings explanation. flied on ______________. has have been Dapproved by the examIner disapproved by the examiner see 11.iie 12. proposed drawing correction filed ./t5/q5 for priority .has been approved sapproved has been see explanation. El Acknowledgement been filed in is made of the ciaim under 35 U.S.C. 119. filed The certified copy received not been received parent application serial no. ____________________ on _______________________ 13. Since this application with the apppears practice to be in condition parte for allowance 1935 C.D. excpt 11 for formal matters prosecution as to the merits is closed In accordance under Ex Quayle 453 0.G. 213. 14.Other jY7 13 j4f flO 4-1L on nL 4- jt EXAMINERS PTOL-326 Rev. 2/93 ACTION VON_865364 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 3 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit part III DETAILED ACTIO$ DraViIgS The proposed drawing sheets of correction filed and/or Ofl the May to proposed 1995 have 1. substitute disapproved label still shown 2. drawings the 15 been does not 310 is because proposed correction 345 not the and figure elements not by shown the 328 and 340 it is 338 reference changes numeral are clear what intended as red-lining on is proposed correction. submit Office the Applicant in required to this of proposed drawing Action. to Any cure correction the response to for proposal defects by applicant of two amendment drawings must OflSjSt parts letter and to the separate NPEP Draftsman in accordance with 608.02r print or pen-and-ink in accordance sketch showing changes in red ink with MPEP 608.02V. filing may but in IMPORTANT correct the NOTE The of new formal until drawings the to is noted the defect be the deferred application ink in allowed by examiner print or pen-and ink is sketch response with to proposed corrections this shown and may red be required Office Action not deferred. VON_865365 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 4 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit specification The following IS 3. quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112 the written description of and using process of making to concise and exact terms as it in such full clear it pertains in the art to which enable any person skilled and use to make connected it is most nearly or with which contemplated by mode forth the best the same and shall set out his invention. the inventor of carrying shall contain the manner and The specification and of invention The first not specification as the is objected to under as 35 U.S.C. 112 does paragraph the specification as is originally filed support The invention of the now claimed. addition and triggering is terminology be new to the and specification deleted in all claims deemed to matter should be instances. Claia Rejections 4. 35 35 usc 112 ClaimS 6483 for the are rejected under set forth U.S.C. the 112 first to the paragraph reasons in objection specification. 5. Claims 8693 and as 117120 being are rejected under failing 35 U.S.C. 112 second point paragraph out and the indefinite for subject to particularly applicant distinctly claim the invention. matter which regards as VON_865366 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 5 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit In claims 86 and 89 line 13 of ... both claims it is not known what is meant by or connection. second signal reflecting on the network element In by claim 117 lines 3-4 and it is not known is what it is meant receiving communication path i.e. how possible to receive communication path and the Claims being 87 88 on 9093 one of 118120 above are rendered indefinite by dependent rejected claims. Claia Rejections 6. 35 Usc 102 The following of 35 U.S.C. this section is quotation of the appropriate paragraphs under form the basis for the rejections 102 that made in this Office action shall be -entitled to patent unless others in this the invention was known or used by in printed publication country or patented or described invention thereof the country before foreign in this or patent. by the applicant for person the sale date of on 7. invention was in publication in this patented or described or foreign country or for this country more than patent in application one year the United printed public use prior to the in in or States. and by 117 are Claims 6466 35 7178 8490 U.S.C. The claims is 94100 as 105 112115 rejected et al. under 102b to the being anticipated invention Gopal on Gopal. wherein instant read Gopal there disclosed comprised elements the of telecommunications switches network architecture to of which is 11-17 corresponding 20 call any one the instant network to and processor group processor. which corresponds instant The setup VON_865367 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 6 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit message response signal. and 8. corresponds from See the to the instant first signal to the and the routing second processor corresponds colUmn lines line 12. instant figure line 4147 column lines 25-46 column Claims 117 are 51column 6467 7179 82 35 84100 U.S.C. 104 105 110 as 112115 clearly and rejected by Epley. under See line 102a column 20. being line anticipated line 9. figures 13 40-COlUmn 18 and column 56-colUmn line Claims 6467 and 6979 119 are 82 8490 93100 35 104 U.S.C. 105 110 being 112117 clearly line rejected under by Rago. 56. 102b and as and anticipated column 18 See figures column line Claim Rejections io. 35 Usc 103 forms the quotation of 35 The following is rejections basis for all obviousness 103 which U.S.C. set forth in this Office action is not obtained though the invention patent may not be in set forth described as identically disclosed or the title if the differences betweenrt are section 102 of this and the prior a to be patented subject matter sought whole would have been as such that the subject matter person invention was made to obvious at the time the which said subject art to in the skill having ordinary by be negatived patentability shall not matter pertains was made. invention the the manner in which which qualifies by another person Subject matter developed of section 102 or subsection as prior art only under under this not preclude patentability of this title shall invention matter and the claimed section where the subject owned by the same invention was made at the time the were VON_865368 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 7 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit person person. ii. or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same ClaimS 80 81 35 9193 101104 103 106109 being and 118120 are Gopal rejected in view under of U.s.c. as unpatentable as over admitted prior art. instant Gopal with the of applied above of encompasses the network element claims types the exception various 9- types and and 36 of networks. Pages 10 that 1519 the 2728 present types specification and indicate types were have been claimed network art at the element time of network It known in the to of as an invention. of would obvious network artisan at the to include in time the invention to element modify the network to Gopal was various the of and types known the art types motivation equipment being for provide compatibility service 12. with various providing to customers. claims rejected 68 80 81 35 83 101103 103 as 106109 being 111 and 118120 over are under of U.S.C. unpatentable as Epley in view admitted prior instant claims types the art. Epley the applied of above encompasses the network element with of exception various 9- types and 36 of networks. Pages 10 that 1519 the 2728 and present types specification and indicate types were the use of involve claimed network art as at the element time of network further known in the such invention elements the use ATM broadband signal format switches would obviOUSlY an broadband ATM cells as artisan would VON_865369 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 8 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit recognize of it would have been obvious of as to an artisan at to include in the the the time invention to modify the network provide network Epley was various element and to types known art the types of motivation being equipment 13. compatibilitY to with various for providing service customers. Claims 120 are 68 80 81 83 91 35 92 101103 103 106109 as being as 111 118 and over rejected of under U.S.C. unpatentable applied Rago in view the admitted prior art. claims types Rago above encompasses network instant with the of exception of various element types and and 36 networks. Pages 9-10 15the in 19 2728 of the present types specification network the indicate that claimed network art at the time element of and types were known use of the as invention would further elements the use such ATM broadband signal it switches format have obviOUSlY as an to involve broadband recognize of ATM cells been artisan would an would obvious of artisan at include the time the invention to modify and network as was Rago to in the the various element network to types provide known the art motivation being equipment for compatibilitY to with various types of providing service customers. Response 14. to Aaendeflt is The amendment 132 filed it 15 May 1995 objected matter to under the 35 U.S.C. because introduces new into VON_865370 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 9 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit specification. introduce added is 35 U.S.C. into is 14 132 states that of the no the amendment invention. shall new matter which page is the disclosure by The material not line supported 13 original disclosure as follows Applicant triggering and. the new required to cancel Office action. filed 15 matter in the response to 15. this Applicants but arguments are not May to be 1995 have been fully In considered to they deemed persuasive. response applicants 1. arguments of and the be the addition new triggering limitation has be been deemed and to 2. matter therefore cannot indicates switch as relied the upon current the claim language before been the read that processor the receives signal applies the signal continues call. this limitation has in before to switch setting up the call path in order complete the Conclusion 16. Applicants amendment necessitated ACTION IS the new grounds See of of M.P.E.P. time rejection. Accordingly Applicant forth in THIS is MAD the FINAL. 706.07a. policy as set reminded of C.F.R. extension 37 1.136a. TO THIS FINAL PERIOD FOR RESPONSE STATUTORY DATE OF THIS THREE MONTHS FROM THE ACTION IS SET TO EXPIRE TWO MONTHS IS FILED WITHIN RESPONSE FIRST IN THE EVENT ACTION. ADVISORY ACTION THE THIS FINAL ACTION AND OF THE MAILING DATE OF SHORTENED VON_865371 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 297-2 Filed 08/18/2007 Page 10 of 10 Serial Art Number 2603 08/238605 Unit SHORTENED THREE-MONTH THE END OF THE MAILED UNTIL AFTER PERIOD WILL EXPIRE IS NOT STATUTORY FEE PERIOD THEN THE SHORTENEDMAILED AND ANY EXTENSION STATUTORY ADVISORY ACTION IS FROM THE ON THE DATE THE 1.136a WILL BE CALCULATED ILL THE W PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. EVENT IN NO ADVISORY ACTION. SIX MONTHS FROM MAILING DATE OF THE EXPIRE LATER THAN FOR RESPONSE PERIOD STATUTORY ACTION. DATE OF THIS FINAL THE or earlier concerning this communication Blum 17. Any inquiry be directed to RUSS should from the examiner can commufliCati0 The examiner is 703 305-4737. whose telephone number from 630am to 430pm. Monday_Thursday normally be reached are the examiner by telephone attempts to reach If Olms can be examiners supervisor Doug for this Group is unsuccessful. the number The fax phone reached at 703305-4703. status or relating to the general nature Any inquiry to the Group receptionist should be directed this application is 703 3054750. whose telephone number of 7033059508. of Russ slum June 29 1995 UGLAS W. PATENT O1.MS EXAMINER UPERV1SO VON 865372

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?