Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al
Filing
297
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of 296 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Evidence of the 301 Family Patents Under the Doctrine of Equivalents by Defendants/Counter Claimants Vonage America, Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G)(Campbell, Terrence)
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al
Doc. 297 Att. 1
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 1 of 10
EXHIBIT A
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 2 of 10
UNITED STATE DEPARTMENT
Patent and
Address
OF COMMERCE
Trademark
D.C.
Office
COMMISSIONER
Washington.
OF PATENTS 20231
AND TRADEMARKS
SERIAL
NUMBER
FILING
DATE
FIRST
NAMED INVENTOR
ATIORNEY
DOCKET
NO.
08/238605
05/05/94
CHRISTIE
SPT1O57
BLUM.
26M1/0707 HARLEY R. BALL SPRINT LAW DEPARTMENT PARKWAY 8140 WARD MOKCMPO5O6 MAILSTOP CITY MO 64114 KANSAS
This
Is
EXAMINER
ARTUNIT
PAPER
NUMBER
2603
DATE
charge
of
MAILED
07/07/95
communication
from
the
examiner
In
your
application.
COMMISSIONER
OF PATENTS
AND
TRADEMARKS
El
This
applicatIon
has been
examined
esponslve
to this action
wiil is
to
communIcation
filed
on
-5//.c9
days 133 35 U.S.C.
hIs
from
the
action
is
made
finai.
shortened
Failure to
statutory
period the
for
response
for
set the
to expire
__________
to
months
abandoned.
date
of this
letter.
respond
within
period
response
cause
application
become
Part
THE
FOLLOWING
AUACHMENTS
Cited
ARE
PART
OF THIS
ACTION
1.
otice
of
References
Cited
by Examiner PTO-1449.
PTO-892.
2.
ii El El
Notice
of
Draftsmans
Informal
Patent
Drawing
Review P10-152.
P10-948.
3. 5.
Notice
of Art
by Applicant
to Effect
4.
Notice
of
Patent
Application
El
Information
on
How
Drawing
Changes
P10-1474..
6.
Part
II
SUMMARY OF ACTION
1.Ims
_________________________________________________
t//2Q
above
claims
are
pending
In
the
application.
Of
the
_____________________________________________________________
are
withdrawn from
consideration.
lalms
il
Claims
have
been
cancelled.
are
allowed.
4.Clalms Il El
Claims
c/.._/
_O
are
rejected.
are
objected
to.
6.
Claims______________________________________________________________
are
subject
to
restriction
or
eiection
requirement.
7..applicatIon El ll
has been
filed
with
informal
drawings
under
37
C.F.R.
1.85
which
are
acceptable
for
examination
purposes.
8.
Formal drawings
are
required
in
response
to this Office
action.
The
are
corrected
or
substitute not
drawings acceptable
have
been
received or
on __________________________.
Notice of
Under Drawing Review
37
C.F.R.
1.84
these drawings
acceptable
see
explanation
Draftsmans
Patent
PTO-948.
10.
ii The
proposed
additional
or substitute
sheets
of
drawings
explanation.
flied
on ______________.
has
have
been
Dapproved
by
the
examIner
disapproved
by
the
examiner
see
11.iie
12.
proposed
drawing
correction
filed
./t5/q5
for
priority
.has
been
approved
sapproved
has been
see
explanation.
El
Acknowledgement been
filed in
is
made
of the
ciaim
under
35
U.S.C.
119.
filed
The
certified
copy
received
not
been
received
parent
application
serial no.
____________________
on _______________________
13.
Since
this
application with the
apppears
practice
to
be
in
condition parte
for
allowance 1935 C.D.
excpt
11
for formal
matters
prosecution
as
to the
merits
is
closed
In
accordance
under
Ex
Quayle
453
0.G.
213.
14.Other
jY7
13
j4f
flO
4-1L on
nL
4- jt
EXAMINERS
PTOL-326 Rev. 2/93
ACTION
VON_865364
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 3 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
part
III
DETAILED
ACTIO$
DraViIgS The proposed drawing
sheets of
correction
filed
and/or
Ofl
the May to
proposed
1995 have
1.
substitute disapproved
label still shown
2.
drawings
the
15
been does not
310
is
because
proposed correction
345 not the and
figure
elements not
by shown the
328
and
340
it is
338
reference changes
numeral
are
clear
what
intended as
red-lining on
is
proposed correction. submit Office
the
Applicant
in
required to
this
of
proposed drawing
Action. to Any cure
correction
the
response to
for
proposal defects
by
applicant
of two
amendment
drawings
must
OflSjSt
parts
letter and to the
separate NPEP
Draftsman
in
accordance
with
608.02r
print or pen-and-ink
in accordance
sketch
showing
changes
in
red ink
with MPEP
608.02V.
filing may but
in
IMPORTANT correct the
NOTE
The
of
new
formal until
drawings
the
to
is
noted the
defect
be the
deferred
application
ink
in
allowed by
examiner
print or pen-and
ink
is
sketch response
with
to
proposed corrections
this
shown and may
red be
required
Office
Action
not
deferred.
VON_865365
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 4 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
specification The following
IS
3.
quotation
of
the
first
paragraph
of
35
U.S.C.
112
the written description of and using process of making to concise and exact terms as it in such full clear it pertains in the art to which enable any person skilled and use to make connected it is most nearly or with which contemplated by mode forth the best the same and shall set out his invention. the inventor of carrying shall contain the manner and
The specification and of invention
The
first not
specification
as the
is
objected
to
under as
35
U.S.C.
112
does
paragraph
the
specification
as
is
originally filed
support The
invention
of the
now
claimed.
addition
and
triggering
is
terminology
be new
to
the and
specification deleted
in all
claims
deemed to
matter
should
be
instances.
Claia Rejections
4.
35
35
usc
112
ClaimS
6483
for the
are
rejected under
set forth
U.S.C. the
112
first to the
paragraph
reasons
in
objection
specification.
5.
Claims
8693
and as
117120
being
are
rejected
under
failing
35
U.S.C.
112
second point
paragraph
out and the
indefinite for subject
to
particularly applicant
distinctly claim the
invention.
matter
which
regards as
VON_865366
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 5 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
In
claims
86
and
89
line
13
of
...
both
claims
it
is
not
known
what
is
meant by
or connection.
second
signal
reflecting
on
the
network
element
In by
claim 117
lines
3-4
and
it
is
not
known
is
what
it
is
meant
receiving
communication
path
i.e.
how
possible to
receive
communication
path
and the
Claims being
87
88
on
9093
one of
118120
above
are
rendered
indefinite by
dependent
rejected
claims.
Claia Rejections
6.
35
Usc
102
The
following
of 35 U.S.C. this section
is quotation of the appropriate paragraphs under form the basis for the rejections 102 that made in this Office action shall be
-entitled to patent unless others in this the invention was known or used by in printed publication country or patented or described invention thereof the country before foreign in this or patent. by the applicant for
person
the sale date of on
7.
invention was
in
publication
in
this
patented or described or foreign country or
for
this
country more than
patent
in
application
one year the United
printed public use prior to the
in in
or
States. and by 117 are
Claims
6466
35
7178 8490
U.S.C. The claims
is
94100
as
105
112115
rejected
et
al.
under
102b
to the
being
anticipated invention
Gopal
on
Gopal.
wherein
instant
read
Gopal
there
disclosed comprised elements
the of
telecommunications switches
network
architecture
to of
which
is
11-17
corresponding
20 call any one
the
instant
network
to
and
processor group
processor.
which
corresponds
instant
The
setup
VON_865367
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 6 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
message response
signal. and
8.
corresponds
from See the
to
the
instant
first
signal to the
and
the
routing second
processor corresponds colUmn
lines line
12.
instant
figure line
4147
column
lines
25-46
column Claims
117 are
51column
6467
7179
82
35
84100
U.S.C.
104
105
110
as
112115
clearly
and
rejected
by Epley.
under
See line
102a
column
20.
being
line
anticipated
line
9.
figures
13
40-COlUmn
18
and
column
56-colUmn
line
Claims
6467
and
6979
119 are
82
8490
93100
35
104
U.S.C.
105
110
being
112117
clearly
line
rejected under
by Rago.
56.
102b
and
as and
anticipated column
18
See
figures
column
line
Claim Rejections
io.
35
Usc
103 forms
the
quotation of 35 The following is rejections basis for all obviousness
103 which U.S.C. set forth in this
Office
action
is not obtained though the invention patent may not be in set forth described as identically disclosed or the title if the differences betweenrt are section 102 of this and the prior a to be patented subject matter sought whole would have been as such that the subject matter person invention was made to obvious at the time the which said subject art to in the skill having ordinary by be negatived patentability shall not matter pertains was made. invention the the manner in which
which qualifies by another person Subject matter developed of section 102 or subsection as prior art only under under this not preclude patentability of this title shall invention matter and the claimed section where the subject owned by the same invention was made at the time the
were
VON_865368
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 7 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
person
person.
ii.
or
subject
to
an
obligation
of
assignment
to
the
same
ClaimS
80
81
35
9193
101104
103
106109
being
and
118120
are Gopal
rejected
in view
under
of
U.s.c.
as
unpatentable
as
over
admitted prior art.
instant
Gopal
with the
of
applied
above
of
encompasses the network element
claims
types the
exception
various
9-
types and
and
36 of
networks.
Pages
10
that
1519
the
2728
present
types
specification
and
indicate types were have
been
claimed network
art at the
element
time of
network
It
known
in the to of as an
invention. of
would
obvious network
artisan at the
to include
in
time the
invention to element
modify the network
to
Gopal was
various
the of
and
types
known
the
art
types
motivation equipment
being
for
provide
compatibility service
12.
with various
providing
to
customers.
claims rejected
68
80
81
35
83
101103
103 as
106109
being
111
and
118120
over
are
under
of
U.S.C.
unpatentable
as
Epley
in view
admitted prior
instant claims types the
art.
Epley
the
applied
of
above
encompasses the network element
with
of
exception
various
9-
types and
36 of
networks.
Pages
10
that
1519
the
2728 and
present
types
specification
and
indicate types were
the use of involve
claimed network
art as at the
element
time of
network further
known
in the such
invention
elements
the use
ATM
broadband
signal format
switches would
obviOUSlY
an
broadband
ATM cells
as
artisan would
VON_865369
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 8 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
recognize
of
it would
have
been
obvious
of as
to
an
artisan at
to include in the
the the
time
invention to
modify the network provide
network
Epley was
various
element and
to
types
known
art the
types of
motivation being equipment
13.
compatibilitY
to
with various
for
providing
service
customers.
Claims
120 are
68
80
81
83
91
35
92
101103
103
106109
as being as
111
118
and over
rejected
of
under
U.S.C.
unpatentable applied
Rago
in view the
admitted prior art.
claims types
Rago
above
encompasses network
instant
with the
of
exception
of
various
element types and
and
36
networks.
Pages
9-10
15the
in
19
2728
of
the
present
types
specification network
the
indicate
that
claimed network
art at the time
element
of
and
types were known
use of
the as
invention would
further
elements
the use
such
ATM
broadband
signal it
switches
format have
obviOUSlY
as an to
involve
broadband recognize
of
ATM cells
been
artisan would
an
would
obvious
of
artisan at
include
the
time
the invention to modify and
network
as was
Rago to
in
the the
various
element
network
to
types
provide
known
the
art
motivation being equipment
for
compatibilitY
to
with
various
types
of
providing
service
customers.
Response
14.
to
Aaendeflt
is
The
amendment
132
filed
it
15
May
1995
objected matter
to
under
the
35
U.S.C.
because
introduces
new
into
VON_865370
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 9 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
specification. introduce added
is
35
U.S.C. into
is 14
132
states that
of the
no the
amendment
invention.
shall
new
matter which page
is
the
disclosure
by
The
material
not line
supported
13
original disclosure
as
follows
Applicant
triggering and.
the new
required to cancel Office
action. filed
15
matter
in
the
response to
15.
this
Applicants
but
arguments
are not
May to be
1995
have
been
fully In
considered
to
they
deemed
persuasive.
response
applicants
1.
arguments
of and
the be the
addition
new
triggering
limitation has
be
been
deemed
and
to
2.
matter
therefore cannot indicates switch
as
relied
the
upon
current
the
claim language
before been the read
that
processor
the
receives
signal
applies
the
signal
continues
call.
this limitation has
in
before to
switch
setting up
the
call
path
in order
complete
the
Conclusion
16.
Applicants
amendment
necessitated ACTION
IS
the
new
grounds
See of
of M.P.E.P. time
rejection.
Accordingly Applicant
forth
in
THIS
is
MAD
the
FINAL.
706.07a.
policy
as set
reminded of
C.F.R.
extension
37
1.136a.
TO THIS FINAL PERIOD FOR RESPONSE STATUTORY DATE OF THIS THREE MONTHS FROM THE ACTION IS SET TO EXPIRE TWO MONTHS IS FILED WITHIN RESPONSE FIRST IN THE EVENT ACTION. ADVISORY ACTION THE THIS FINAL ACTION AND OF THE MAILING DATE OF SHORTENED
VON_865371
Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL
Document 297-2
Filed 08/18/2007
Page 10 of 10
Serial Art
Number
2603
08/238605
Unit
SHORTENED THREE-MONTH THE END OF THE MAILED UNTIL AFTER PERIOD WILL EXPIRE IS NOT STATUTORY FEE PERIOD THEN THE SHORTENEDMAILED AND ANY EXTENSION STATUTORY ADVISORY ACTION IS FROM THE ON THE DATE THE 1.136a WILL BE CALCULATED ILL THE W PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. EVENT IN NO ADVISORY ACTION. SIX MONTHS FROM MAILING DATE OF THE EXPIRE LATER THAN FOR RESPONSE PERIOD STATUTORY ACTION. DATE OF THIS FINAL THE or earlier concerning this communication Blum 17. Any inquiry be directed to RUSS should from the examiner can commufliCati0 The examiner is 703 305-4737. whose telephone number from 630am to 430pm. Monday_Thursday normally be reached are the examiner by telephone attempts to reach If Olms can be examiners supervisor Doug for this Group is unsuccessful. the number The fax phone reached at 703305-4703.
status or relating to the general nature Any inquiry to the Group receptionist should be directed this application is 703 3054750. whose telephone number of
7033059508.
of
Russ slum June 29 1995
UGLAS W. PATENT
O1.MS
EXAMINER
UPERV1SO
VON
865372
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?