In Re: Apple iPhone 3G and 3GS MMS Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation

Filing 228

NOTICE by Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC of Recent Decision. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Reference: All Cases)(Parasharami, Archis)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: APPLE iPHONE 3G AND 3GS MMS MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL NO. 2116 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES SECTION: J 2:09-md-2116 JUDGE BARBIER MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILKINSON AT&T MOBILITY LLC’s NOTICE OF RECENT DECISION AT&T Mobility LLC (“ATTM”) respectfully submits this notice of recent decision to inform the Court of the decision in Kaltwasser v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 07-cv-00411 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2011), enforcing ATTM’s arbitration agreement under Concepcion, in advance of the status conference scheduled for September 22, 2001. A copy of the decision, which was issued after ATTM filed its position paper on September 19, 2011, is attached as Exhibit A. Respectfully submitted, /s Archis A. Parasharami Archis A. Parasharami aparasharami@mayerbrown.com Evan M. Tager etager@mayerbrown.com MAYER BROWN LLP 1999 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006-1101 Telephone: (202) 263-3000 Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 Kathleen Taylor Sooy ksooy@crowell.com Tracy A. Roman troman@crowell.com CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2595 Telephone: (202) 624-2500 Facsimile: (202) 628-5116 Gary J. Russo JONES, WALKER, WAECHTER, POITEVENT, CARRER, DENEGRE LLP 600 Jefferson Street, Suite 1600 Lafayette, Louisiana 70501 Telephone: (337) 262-9000 Facsimile: (337) 262-9001 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 20th day of September, 2011, I served the foregoing by causing it to be filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to case participants. s/ Archis A. Parasharami Archis A. Parasharami

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?