Gregoire et al v. Transocean, Ltd.

Filing 6

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re 1 Complaint, or to file responsive pleadings by BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Haycraft, Don)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM D. GREGOIRE; VERONICA G. STELLY; TOBY J. STELLY versus TRANSOCEAN, LTD.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER INC.; BP, PLC; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; HALLIBURTON COMPANY; CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; ABC INSURANCE COMPANY; DEF INSURANCE COMPANY; GHI INSURANCE COMPANY; JKL INSURANCE COMPANY; MNO INSURANCE COMPANY; PQR INSURANCE COMPANY; STU INSURANCE COMPANY; XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-01351 SECTION "A" DIVISION "5" JUDGE JAY C. ZAINEY MAGISTRATE ALMA CHASEZ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, come BP Exploration & Production Inc. and BP Products North America, Inc. (collectively the "BP Defendants"), and move this Court for an order granting an extension of time within which to file responsive pleadings in the above-captioned proceeding, in accordance with Local Rule 7.9E. In support of this motion, BP Defendants represent as follows: 1. This Court's Local Rule 7.9(E) provides that by ex parte motion a party may receive an extension of time to plead of twenty (20) days from the time the pleading otherwise would be due, upon certification that there has been no previous extension of time within which to plead and that the opposing party has not filed into the record an objection to an extension of time. 2. Responsive pleadings are otherwise due to be filed by BP Defendants on or before June 15, 2010. 3. Undersigned counsel hereby certifies that there has been no previous extension of time within which to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action, and that the plaintiffs have not filed into the record an objection to an extension of time. WHEREFORE, BP Exploration & Production Inc. and BP Products North America, Inc. respectfully move this Court on an ex parte basis for an extension of time within which to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action of twenty (20) days from the time a responsive pleading otherwise would be due, or through and including July 5, 2010. -2- Respectfully submitted, /s/ Don K. Haycraft Donald R. Abaunza (Bar #2273) R. Keith Jarrett (Bar #16984) Don K. Haycraft (Bar #14361) Jonathan A. Hunter (Bar #18619) Mark D. Latham (Bar #19673) Robert E. Holden (Bar #6935) LISKOW & LEWIS One Shell Square 701 Poydras Street, Suite 5000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70139-5099 Telephone: (504) 581-7979 Facsimile: (504) 556-4108 and Of Counsel: Richard C. Godfrey, P.C. John T. Hickey Jr., P.C. J. Andrew Langan, P.C. Matthew T. Regan, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP 300 North LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60654 312-862-2000 (Tel) 312-862-2200 (Fax) Attorneys for BP Exploration & Production Inc. and BP Products North America, Inc. -3- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 26, 2010, a copy of the foregoing pleading was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all counsel of record registered to receive electronic service by operation of the court's electronic filing system. I also certify that I have mailed this filing by United States Postal Service to all counsel of record who are not registered to receive electronic service by operation of the court's electronic filing system. /s/ Don K. Haycraft Don K. Haycraft -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?