Rankin v. Corrections Corp of America et al

Filing 9

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations of the magistrate judge. ORDERED plaintiff's complaint be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and failing to state a claim for which relief can be granted as to Corrections Corporati on of America, Officer Smith, Lieutenant Braxton and Officer Triplet. ORDERED plaintiff's request for injunctive relief in the form of an order directing Warden Wilkinson to fire the defendants and to transfer Breedlove and Edwards is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 05/26/2009. (crt,Leleux, M)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION VERDELL R.ANKIN (DO.C.#326516) DOCKET NO. SEC. P 08-CV-1860; VERSUS CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ET AL. JUDGE DEE D. DRELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIfl JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint be and is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and failing to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2) (b) as to the following defendants: corrections Corporation of America, Officer Smith, Lieutenant Braxton, and Officer Triplet. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief in the form of an order directing Warden Wilkinson to fire the defendants and to transfer Inmates Breedlove and Edwards be and is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2) (b) It THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this day of ,MQ2/ 2009. DEE D. DRELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?