Watkins v. Augustine

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM ORDER: 7 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Timothy Ray Watkins, and 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Timothy Ray Watkins are stricken and this case is closed. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 11/4/09. (crt,Delgado, S)

Download PDF
USDC, WESTERN DISTRICT OF LA. TO__Y______O--)~CLERK N_ )~ MO _ P ~ __ DATE / 1/1 BY__-~4 ~IECVED EI _zj(_*' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION TIMOTHY RAY WATKINS VERSUS L. AUGUSTINE, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1731 JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES MEMORANDUM ORDER On October 9, 2009, the Court issued an Order [Doc. No. 5] detailing the history ofPetitioner Timothy Ray Watkins' filings, denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordering him to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 within twenty (20) days of the date of the Order. On October 27, 2009, the Clerk of Court received for filing a Motion to Transfer Case [Doe. No. 7] submitted by Petitioner. In his motion, Petitioner also indicated that he was seeking injunctive relief; therefore, the Clerk of Court filed his motion separately [Doc. No. 6] as a motion for temporary restraining order. In his filing, Petitioner contends that his case should be transferred "do [sic] to legal problems to plaintiff James Jones, #108280 Cajun-2-C-l is pro se and in forma pauperis. Class Action Suite [sic]." [Doe. No. 6]. The Court finds that Petitioner has failed to comply with the Court's October 9, 2009 Order by paying his filing fee, and he has not alleged that he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(g). Further, to the extent that he seeks to "transfer" his case to a case filed by another prisoner, he has no right to do so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's pleadings be STRICKEN, and this case CLOSED. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of November, 2009. ROBERT G~4MES J CHIEF JUbOE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?