Jacobson v. Corrections et al

Filing 24

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants at Catahoula Correctional Center, Richwood Corrections Center and the Louisiana Department of Corrections for failure to timely dispense his hypertension medication are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 41(b) and Local Rule 41.3. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 6/16/09. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
RECEIVED LJSDC WESTERN DISTRICT OF LA. TONY B. MOORE, CLERK DATE _4-I"4 i49 BY-- -- ~ -- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION ALEXANDER BERNARD JACOBSON VERSUS LA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1123 JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 22] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record, 1T IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants at Catahoula Correctional Center, Richwood Corrections Center, and the Louisiana Department of Corrections for failure to timely dispense his hypertension medication are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(b) and Local Rule 41.3. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this ____ day of June, 2009. ROBERT G. JA ~S J UNITED STATES~1i1STRICT UDGE J

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?