Reynolds v. Newcomer et al
Filing
34
RULING re 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 Complaint filed by Jackie Reynolds and 31 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jackie Reynolds. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 1/19/2010. (crt,Dickerson, D)
RECEIVED LJSDC WESTERN DISTRICT OF LA. TONY R MOORE. CLER DATE BY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTEPJS~ ISTRICT OF LOUISIANA D MONROE DIVISION
JACKIE REYNOLDS VERSUS WARDEN NEWCOMER, ET AL.
CIV. A. NO. 09-1077 JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES RULING
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jackie Reynolds' ("Reynolds") civil rights complaint. On December 21, 2009, Magistrate Judge Karen L. Hayes issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 30], recommending that his complaint be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rather than file objections to Magistrate Judge Hayes' Report and Recommendation, Reynolds filed a Motion to Dismiss [Doe. No. 31] his case, stating only that he moves the Court "to `Dismiss' this lawsuite [sic]." This is not the first time the Court has been faced with a prisoner who seeks to dismiss his case after an unfavorable report and recommendation has issued. It is the opinion of this Court that prisoners should not be allowed to violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915, by tactics such as this.
See Latson v.
Johnson, Civil Action No. 08-1962, 2009 WL 2824874 (W.D. La. Sept. 2, 2009) (citing Stone v. Smith, No. CV608-088, 2009 WL 368620 (S.D .Ga. Feb. 13, 2009)). The Court has considered and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doe. No. 30]. The Court finds that Reynolds has failed to state a claim as a 1
matter of law, and his claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Based on the foregoing, Reynolds' voluntary Motion to Dismiss [Doe. No. 31] is DENIED AS MOOT. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this
II
day of January, 2010.
ROBE T G(JJ~'MES UNITED STATES DI~RICT UDGE J
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?